Page 54 [54]
52 TAMÁS Kocsis
Recommended reading
Harangozó, G. — Csutora, M. — Kocsis, T. 2018. “How big is big enough? Toward a
sustainable future by examining alternatives to the conventional economic growth
paradigm”. Sustainable Development, 26/2: 172-181.
It gives a systematic overview of the paradigms of positive, zero and negative economic
growth, and their advantages and disadvantages in the economic management of the
sustainability problem. A tabular summary provides a quick overview.
Bibliography
Bajmöcy, Zoltan 2022. , Helyettesíthető-e a természeti és az ember alkotta tőke, avagy a
technolögia mindent megold?” [Are natural and man-made capital complements or
substitutes, or does technology solve everything?] Kovdsz, 26: e5. https://doi.
org/10.14267/kov.2022e5
Barbier, Edward B. 1989. Economics, Natural-Resource Scarcity and Development:
Conventional and Alternative Views. London, Earthscan Publications Limited.
Barnett, Harod J. — Morse, Chandler 1963. Scarcity and Economic Growth: The Economics
of Natural Resource Availability. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.
Baumol, William J. — Oates, Wallace Eugene 1988. The theory of environmental policy.
2nd Edition. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
Boulding, Kenneth Ewart 1966. The economics of the coming spaceship Earth. In Jarrett,
Henry (ed.): Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Resources for the Future.
Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 3-14.
Christensen, Paul P. 1989. “Historical roots for ecological economics — biophysical versus
allocative approaches”. Ecological Economics, 1: 17-36.
Christensen, Paul P. 1991. Driving forces, increasing returns and ecological sustainability.
In Costanza (ed.): Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability.
New York, Columbia University Press, 75—87.
Csutora, Mária 2022. , Rossz mutató vagy csak bűnbak? A GDP mint jólléti mutatószám"
IGDP as a well-being indicator — Bad indicator or just a scapegoat?]. Kovász, 26: el0.
https://doi.org/10.14267/kov.2022e10
Daly, Herman E. 1979. Entropy, growth and the political economy of scarcity. In Smith,
V. Kerry (ed.) 1979: Scarcity and Growth Reconsidered. Baltimore, John Hopkins
University Press.
Daly, Herman E. — Cobb, J. B. Jr. 1989. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy
Toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future. Boston, Beacon
Press.
Dombi, Mihály 2022. , Közgazdaságtan és társadalmi metabolizmus? [Economics and
material throughput]. Kovdsz, 26: e4. https://doi.org/10.14267/kov.2022e4
Easterlin, Richard Ainley 1974. Does economic growth improve the human lot? In David,
Paul A. — Reder, Melvin W. (eds.): Nations and Households in Economic Growth.
New York: Academic Press.
Gébert, Judit 2022. , Gazdasági növekedés: mennyi az elég?" [Economic growth: how
much is enough?] Kovász, 26: e7. https://doi.org/10.14267/kov.2022e7
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge,
Mass., Harvard University Press
Gordon, H. Scott. 1954. “Economic theory of acommon-property resource: the fishery”.
Journal of Political Economy, 62: 124-142.
Gray, Lewis Cecil 1914. “Rent under the assumption of exhaustibility”. Quarterly Journal
of Economics, 28: 466-489.