Page 146 [146]
OCR
HEIDEMARIE MÜLLER-RIEDLHUBER + the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) + the European e-Competence Framework?? ¢ the Carer+ Digital Competence Framework”? COMPETENCE FRAMEWORKS FOR SUPERVISION AND COACHING A common terminological basis and competence framework is particularly important for the description of professional competences in the field of counselling, supervision and coaching as professions in this field do not belong to regulated professions and in most European countries are not subject to binding legal definitions and quality standards. Furthermore, there is a plethora of varying concurrent definitions of counselling, supervision and coaching and a number of competing professional networks that claim to possess the legitimacy and leadership qualities to oversee and manage the professionalization of the field in many countries. The characteristics of fragmentation may be the reason why the need for professionalization in the field of counselling, supervision and coaching has been a topic discussed in several research papers.‘ For example, Fietze emphasizes that both Supervision and Coaching practitioners “offer personal counselling in a work-related context and claim that their work activities represent a profession””>. Therefore, it is important for practitioners from both groups to define the scope of their professional identity in relation to other 2 For details see: information at the website of the European Council on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/cadrel_en.asp, accessed 13 October 2015. For details see: European e-Competence Framework website: www.ecompetences.eu/, accessed 13 October 2015. 3 For details see: Carer+ Digital Competence Framework: http://carerplus.eu/developingtraining/wiki/digital-competence-framework, accessed 13 October 2015. ” Publications include: A. Schreyögg — Ch. Schmidt-Lellek (eds.), Die Professionalisierung von Coaching, Ein Lesebuch für den professionellen Coach, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag, 2015.; B. Fietze, Profilbildung und Statuskonkurrenz. Zur Professionalisierung neuer Beratungsformen, in: E. M. Graf -Y. Aksu - 1. Pick - S. Rettinger (eds.), Beratung, Supervision, Coaching, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Springer, 2011, 23-36.; C. Schiersmann - P. C. Weber, Professionalität als Herausforderung: Ein Kompetenzprofil für das Beratungspersonal im Feld Bildung, Beruf und Beschäftigung, BIBB, BWP, 4 (2009) 9-13. » Fietze, Profilbildung und Statuskonkurrenz. 23.: “Sowohl im Falle der Supervision wie im Falle des Coachings handelt es sich um personenbezogene Beratungsformen im arbeitsweltlichen Kontext, die mit dem Anspruch auftreten, eine Profession zu sein.” /Translation H. M.-R.: “Both, supervision and coaching represent personal counselling forms in a work-related context and claim to be a profession.”/ , 144 "
