Page 197 [197]
OCR
DEVELOPING EU CRIMINAL LAW — SOME PERSONAL REFLECTIONS ON 9 MAY The transfer of criminal proceedings, perhaps in the broader context of rules on conflicts of jurisdiction and the principle of ne bis in idem; Cross-border use and admissibility of certain types of evidence; Protecting vulnerable suspects and accused persons; Updating Union law on corruption and environmental crime; Extending the material competence of the EPPO and harmonising its procedures; Developing minimum standards on pre-trial detention and on compensation for unlawful detention; Continuing work on victims’ rights, including access to justice and compensation; Enhancing convergence and cooperation between Eurojust, the European Judicial Network (EJN), and the EPPO; Issuing or revising handbooks on mutual recognition instruments to help practitioners implement CJEU case law; Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in criminal proceedings; Enhancing the digitalisation and interoperability of criminal justice authorities and EU bodies. 6 Ban Tamas — Bard Karoly, Az Európai Emberi Jogok Egyezménye és a magyar jog: 5., 6. és 7. cikkek, Acta Humana: Hungarian Centre for Human Rights Publications 3 (1992) 3-162; Bard Karoly, European Criminal Law?, in Lahti, Raimo (ed.), Towards a Rational and Humane Criminal Policy = Kohti rationaalista ja humaania kriminaalipolitiikkaa: Dedicated to Inkeri Anttila = omistettu Inkeri Anttilalle, Helsinki, European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control (HEUNI), 1996, 241-253; Bard Karoly, Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Article Six of the European Human Rights Convention in a Comparative Perspective, Budapest, Magyar Hivatalos Kozlonykiad6, 2008; Bard Karoly, Az áldozatok méltósága és a vádlottak jogai: összehasonlító jogi tanulmány, Budapest, HVG-ORAC Lapés Könyvkiadó Kft., 2021. + 195 *
