Oldal 216 [216]
IRODALOM 215
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991): Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lénard, S., & Rapos, N. (2004): Magtdr — Ötletek az adaptiv oktatäshoz, Budapest: OKI.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S. Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A. & Ashwin, P. (2006): How approaches to
teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31
(3): 285-298.
Little, J. W. (1990): The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers’ Pro¬
fessional Relations. Teachers College Record, 91 (4): 509-536.
Littleton, K. & Hakkinen, P. (1999): Learning together: Understanding the process of
computer-based collaborative learning. In: Dillengourg, P. (ed.): Collaborative learning:
Cognitive and computational approaches, Oxford: Pergamon, 20-31.
Lueddeke, G. R. (2003): Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: A study
of disciplinary variation and ,teaching-scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (2):
213-228. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000058082
Lukács, I. & Derényi, A. (2017, szerk.): Kézikönyv a képzési programok tanulási eredményeken
alapú fejlesztésébez, felülvizsgálatáboz, Budapest: Oktatási Hivatal.
Lukács, I. (2015): Tanulási eredményekre alapuló fejlesztés, egy pilot tapasztalatai. In: Vámos
Á. 8- Kopp E. (szerk.): A tanulás támogatásának új megözelítései és eszközei a felsőoktatásban.
Kutatás, fejlesztés, akciókutatás. Budapest: Oktatási Hivatal, 77-110.
Lukenchuk, A. & Kolich, E. (2013): Paradigms and Educational Research: Weaving the
Tapestry. In: Lukenchuk, A. (2013, ed.): Paradigms of Research for the 21* Century. Per¬
spectives and Examples from Practice. Peter Lang. 61-90.
Marton, F, & Saljé, R. (1976a): On Qualitative Differences in Learning I.: Outcome and
Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 (1): 4-11.
Marton, F. & Saljé, R. (1976b): On Qualitative Differences in Learning II.: Outcome as a
Function of the Learner's Conception of the Task. British Journal of Educational Psychol¬
ogy, 46 (2): 115-127.
May, H. & Bridger, K. (2010): Developing and embedding inclusive policy and practice within
higher education. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
McAlpine, L. (2016): Why might you use narrative methodology? A story about narrative. Eesti
Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 4 (1): 32-57. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/eha.2016.4.1.02b
McAlpine, L. & Weston, C. (2000): Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’
teaching and students’ learning, Instructional Science, 28, 363-385.
McDonald, J. & Cater-Steel, A. (2017, eds.): Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher
Education. Dreamers and Schemers. Singapore: Springer.
McDonald, J., Nagy, J., Star, C., Burch, T., Cox, M. D., & Margetts, F. (2012). Identifying
and building the leadership capacity of community of practice facilitators. Learning
Communities Journal, 4. https://eprints.usq.edu.au/26120/8/McDonald_Nagy_Star_
Burch_Cox_Margetts_LCJ_2012_AV.pdf
Medina, L. C. (2018): Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education, Aus¬
tralasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1).