the above, however, one could also hold the view that selfish growth
 that destroys its natural and social environment is but one of the
 possible alternatives. It does not arise from the essence of market
 economy, but is rather due to a newer development: the concentration
 of capital that puts civil society and democracy under strain; the
 impenetrable and uncontrollable system of global corporate empires
 and financial networks. Globalisation means that the negative feedback
 limiting the business interests related to unconditional growth has
 effectively vanished from the system. Hitherto the state represented
 natural, social and cultural interests (“cost factors”), on the basis of a
 mandate from its citizens. Now the roles have changed. The
 disintegration of communities and the increased control exercised by
 the mass media over publicity leads to the citizens’ inability to influence
 or control the actions of the state. The political enterprises (the so-called
 parties) that specialised in the appropriation and mining of the
 instruments of public power fall under the control of the multinational
 corporate interests that finance them or they themselves build up their
 own economic empire. But the success or failure of the latter, the
 anticapitalist regimes that took control in the post-communist
 countries, also depends, like any other enterprise, on the results of the
 competition (economic in name, but concerning power in reality) in
 the global sphere. Thus, the roles are reversed: the corporate world
 dictates to the states and the states ensure that the majority of their
 subjects cooperate and even approve of the social, cultural,
 environmental and security policy measures in line with “economic”
 interests.
 
However, as previously indicated, these developments liquidate the
 market economy itself, in the strict sense of the word — if the market is
 taken to mean the spontaneous competition and negotiations of
 independent participants with an equal chance in theory, acting
 according to rules transparent for all of them. The corporate empires
 masquerading as companies behave much more like political
 organisations and wield political power. They do not levy tax, but instead
 rake in the spoils in the form of profit. In the majority of cases, they do
 not take care of the destruction of their opponents themselves, but
 instead use the assistance of the state to do so.
 
Unfortunately, the political left and right have both failed to provide
 a faithful description of the changes that have occurred in late modern
 industrial society. The left was perhaps hindered in doing so by its
 irresistible attraction towards simple answers and the right by its