Page 61 [61]
OCR
RHETORICAL AND POETICAL CONVENTIONS One of the most outstanding characteristics of these lines is that there is a distinctive tension between the content and form of the utterance, since the repeated phrase "I loue you" frames the seven-line-long passage describing the inexpressibility of love, although every line can be read as an attempt to define its meaning. The emphatic presence of the rhetorical figures highlighted above signals that, in the first act, the characters of King Lear establish a special manner of speech that Craig Kallendorf characterizes as “opaque” language, which in his wording generates passages to be “looked at not through.”**! His usage of this term means that the characters’ diction draws attention to its own rhetorical construction, instead of focusing on the transparency of the referential function of language. To return to the description of the rhetorical complexity of Gonorill’s passage cited above, it is worth recalling that the third book of Puttenham’s work divides tropes into the three distinct categories of auricular, sensible, and sententious figures: And that first sort of figures doth serue th’eare onely and may be therefore called Auricular: your second serues the conceit onely and not th’eare, and may be called sensable, not sensible nor yet sententious: your third sort serues as well th’eare as the conceit and may be called sententious figures, because not only they properly apperteine to full sentences, for bewtifying them with a currant & pleasant numerositie, but also giuing them efficacie, and enlarging the whole matter besides with copious amplifications.” Of these three categories, Gonorill’s lines provide the most examples of aurical figures. First, due to its syntactical position, the phrase “I loue you” can be described in Puttenham’s terminology both as a prozeugma and a hypozeugma: But if it be to mo clauses then one, that some such word be supplied to perfit the congruitie or sence of them all, it is by the figure [Zeugma] we call him the [single supplie] because by one word we serue many clauses of one congruitie [...] if it be placed in the forefront of all the seuerall clauses whome he is to serue as acommon seruitour, then is he called by the Greeks Prozeugma, by vs the Ringleader [...] But if such supplie be placed after all the clauses, and not before nor in the middle, then is he called by the Greeks Hypozeugma, and by vs the [Rerewarder].?* Second, as the red fonts show, the second, third, fourth, and fifth lines start with an asyndeton: “Ye haue another sort of speach in a maner defectiue because it wants good band or coupling, and is the figure [Asyndeton] we call 231 Kallendorf: King Lear, 106. 232 Puttenham: The Arte, 133. 233 Ibid., 136-137.
