Page 56 [56]
OCR
SHAKESPEARE’S ART OF POESY IN KING LEAR Lisak does not extend her attention to King Lear, however, and she only briefly refers to Kenneth Muir’s observation in the 1977 Arden Shakespeare critical edition of King Lear according to which the passage known as the Merlin prophesy in the Folio version of the play is “a parody of some pseudoChaucerian verses to be found in Puttenham.”’” Gary Taylor repeats the same idea in the 1980s, but he is interested in this passage and the PuttenhamShakespeare connection only as far as it helps him prove that the Folio version was edited at the same time as Shakespeare was working on The Winter’s Tale and, thus, “whoever wrote that addition had been influenced by Puttenham — as Shakespeare had been between 1609 and 1611.”?!8 Given the distance of four hundred years, it is almost impossible to provide undeniable proof that would support the claim that Shakespeare read The Arte of English Poesie, although there is some evidence in support of this assumption. First, as the signature on the inside cover testifies, the original owner of the copy of The Arte of English Poesie in the possession of the British Museum today was Ben Jonson, Shakespeare’s fellow dramatist and close friend.? Second, Shakespeare’s Venus and Adonis and Puttenham’s handbook were published by Richard Field, with whom Shakespeare most certainly had established both business and family ties.*’° Third, it has recently been proposed that the main reason why Shakespeare’s plays reflect such a remarkable parallelism with The Arte of English Poesy is that Puttenham might have been Shakespeare’s teacher." Working as a poet and playwright whose works were performed even on the stage of the royal court, Shakespeare must have taken a natural interest in both the description of the norms of courtly rhetoric and, even more, in contemporaneous debates concerning the craft of poetry. Moreover, considering the famous line of Ben Jonson’s eulogy published in the 1623 Folio, in which Johnson claimed that the Bard had “small Latine and lesse Greek,”? An Essay in Comparison: Shakespeare’s «Technical Inventiveness» in the Light of George Puttenham’s Arte, in Shakespeare and Ses Contemporains. Société Française Shakespeare, Actes du Congrès de 2002, 2002, 132-133. Cf.: William Shakespeare: The Arden Edition ofthe Works of William Shakespeare, ed. Kenneth Muir, London-New York, Routledge, 1977, 104. Gary Taylor: The Date and Authorship of the Folio Version, in Gary Taylor-Michael Warren (eds.): The Division of the Kingdoms. Shakespeare’s Two Versions of King Lear, Oxford, Calderon Press, 1983, 385. 24 See “Note.” Puttenham: The Arte, npn. 215 Gillespie: Shakespeare’s Books, 439. 26 Charles Murray Willis: The Printing of Ihe Arte of English Poesie and the Earl of Oxford, in Richard Malim (ed.): Great Oxford: essays on the life and work of Edward De Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, 1550-1604, London, Parapress Limited, 2004, 38-44. 217 Ben Jonson: To the memory of my beloued, the Avthor Mr. William Shakespeare: and what he hath left vs, in Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, histories & tragedies, published according to the true originall copies, London, printed by Isaac Jaggard and Edward Blount, 1623, http:// internetshakespeare.uvic.ca/Library/facsimile/book/SLNSW_F1/, (accessed 1 March 2009). 21. DS 21. u a « 54 e
