Ugrás a tartalomra
mobile

L'Harmattan Open Access platform

  • Keresés
  • OA Gyűjtemények
  • L'Harmattan Archívum
Magyarhu
  • Englishen
  • Françaisfr
  • Deutschde
BejelentkezésRegisztráció
  • Kötet áttekintése
  • Oldal
  • Szöveg
  • Metaadatok
  • Kivágás
Előnézet
022_000116/0000

Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) to Assess Recovery Processes. Qualitative analysis of experience and identity

  • Előnézet
  • PDF
  • Metaadatok mutatása
  • Permalink mutatása
Szerző
Szilvia Kassai
Tudományterület
Clinical psychology / Klinikai pszichológia (12749), Addiction sciences / Addikciótudományok (12754), Mental health / Mentális egészség (12169)
Sorozat
RendSzerTan
Tudományos besorolás
monográfia
022_000116/0078
  • Kötet áttekintése
  • Oldal
  • Szöveg
  • Metaadatok
  • Kivágás
Oldal 79 [79]
  • Előnézet
  • Permalink mutatása
  • JPG
  • TIFF
  • Előző
  • Következő
022_000116/0078

OCR

6. GENERAL DISCUSSION 6.1. INTRODUCTION Recovery approach originates from 12-step fellowship (such as Alcoholics Anonymous), but it is widely used as a guiding principle in the mental health treatment as well (Jacobson & Curtis, 2000; Laudet, 2007; Lipczynska, 2011). The spread of the approach is due to deinstitutionalization movement which is based on the fact that a person with several mental issues wants and needs more than just a symptom relief (Anthony, 1993). The elements of the recovery process (according to the recovery approach) are building a strong and positive identity, agency, finding meaningful roles, social integration, hope and focusing on the future could help overcome multiple problems and moving towards something more a positive, meaningful life (Terry & Cardwell, 2015). Although, the recovery approach gives an opportunity to a wide range of people to find their personal and suitable way of managing multiple problems many concerns about the approach have appeared. For example “recovery is > old’, “it adds to the burden of mental health professionals’, “recovery happens 2 » cc for very few people’, “this is an irresponsible fad’, "it happens only after and a 22 Ce result of an active treatment”, “it can be implemented only through the introduction of new services”, “recovery-oriented services are not evidence-based”, “recovery approach devalues the role of professional intervention”, and “it increases providers exposure to risk and liability” (Davidson, Oconnell, Tondora, Styron, & Kangas, 2006, p. 642). Nevertheless, in the USA, the recovery approach has become a legitimate part of treatment in the mental health system. A turnabout in attitudes came as a result of deinitialization, consumer movement and self-help activities (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.). Self-help activities in Hungary are in infancy that is why the importance of scientific research on recovery is outstanding. It could legitimate its existence in mental health, addiction, and psychiatric treatment by outlining the experiences of individuals who can be considered as “evidence” for the effectiveness of the recovery approach (e.g.: “Dont tell me that recovery is not evidence based. I’m the evidence.” - Woman with serious mental illness, see: Davidson et al., 2006, p. 640).

Szerkezeti

Custom

Image Metadata

Kép szélessége
1830 px
Kép magassága
2834 px
Képfelbontás
300 px/inch
Kép eredeti mérete
1.05 MB
Permalinkből jpg
022_000116/0078.jpg
Permalinkből OCR
022_000116/0078.ocr

Linkek

  • L'Harmattan Könyvkiadó
  • Open Access Blog
  • Kiadványaink az MTMT-ben
  • Kiadványaink a REAL-ban
  • CrossRef Works
  • ROR ID

Elérhetőség

  • L'Harmattan Szerkesztőség
  • Kéziratleadási szabályzat
  • Peer Review Policy
  • Adatvédelmi irányelvek
  • Dokumentumtár
  • KBART lists
  • eduID Belépés

Social media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

L'Harmattan Open Access platform

BejelentkezésRegisztráció

Bejelentkezés

eduId Login
Elfelejtettem a jelszavamat
  • Keresés
  • OA Gyűjtemények
  • L'Harmattan Archívum
Magyarhu
  • Englishen
  • Françaisfr
  • Deutschde