Page 194 [194]
OCR
MARIE-CLAUDE GILL-LACROIX own culture on particular geographical areas." As such, Sauer and his followers spent much oftheir time mapping material left behind by cultural groups which once resided in certain regions." Physical artifacts like fences and cabins were used by the Berkeley School to classify cultural traditions geographically.?° By virtue of these practices, Sauer claimed: “culture is the agent, the natural area is the medium, the cultural landscape is the result.” Although embraced by scholars well into the 1990s, the Berkeley School is now widely regarded as outdated.” Sauer and his followers. have been accused of maintaining an “object fetish”, detrimental in that it can only study past sedentary agricultural societies.** Research based on the teachings of the Berkeley School has therefore come to be described as relying an ‘old’ cultural geography.** Conversely, ‘new’ cultural geographers avoid basing their scholarship on tangible material and discernible landscapes.” Instead, these scholars tend to understand geography as a “sophisticated cultural construction.”*° The “symbolic qualities of landscape” (i.e. the qualities capable of molding social meanings attached to geography) have consequently become the main source of research for those espousing newer forms of cultural geography.*’ Cosgrove and Jackson, for instance, use cultural geography in order to “[give] meaning to an external world whose history has to be understood in relation to the material appropriation of land.” Jackson is especially interested in understanding culture as a “domain in which social relations of dominance and subordination are negotiated and resisted, where meanings are not just imposed, but contested.”” As such, cultural geography has been found to serve scholars interested in postcolonial studies.*° Both fields are said to have “intersected” in the past and will continue to do so in the context of this paper." ‘New’ cultural geographers’ interest in the implicit meanings which underlie geography stand in stark contrast to the explicit artifacts studied by Peter Jackson, Maps of Meaning: An Introduction to Cultural Geography, New York, Routledge, 2003, 13. Cosgrove-Jackson, New Directions, 96. 20 Ibid. Sauer quote extracted from: Mario Bédard, La géographie culturelle québécoise: Rôle et objet depuis la Révolution tranquille, Érudit, Vol. 51, No. 143 (September 2007), 222. Price-Lewis, The Reinvention, 1-17; Cosgrove-Jackson, New Directions, 95-101. Price-Lewis, The Reinvention, 3; Cosgrove-Jackson, New Directions, 96. Price-Lewis, The Reinvention, 1-17. Ibid.; Cosgrove-Jackson, New Directions, 95-101. Cosgrove and Jackson, New Directions, 96. 27 Ibid. 28 Ibid., 95-96. Jackson, Maps of Meaning, xi. Catherine Nash, Cultural Geography: postcolonial cultural geographies, Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2002), 219-230. 31 Ibid., 219. + 192 +
