to the mode of thought that was just awakening to self-discovery
 during the Enlightenment, so however the travels have shown how
 many different people live in the world, but that was not enough for
 the mind. (Kant 1977. 8. p.89-106.)* Kant committed this to paper
 in 1785. In 1775, he began another of his works with a remark that
 was uncommon at the time: “all humans in the whole word belong
 to the same natural genus” (Kant 1998 p.39. Kant 1977. 2. p.427.) With
 all this in mind, it is very difficult to write calmly about the insane
 remarks that typically circulate that Kant was a racist. Whoever
 says this, 1. has not read Kant (or did not understand a bit of it),
 2. does not understand the 18th-century concept of “race”. (Ibid)
 
Who or what is a stranger and how do they relate to me, the
 European? That the stranger is inferior was not in doubt at this
 time. The point of reference was the white race. Everything and
 everyone else was measured by that standard. (This should be
 evaluated according to its place, in its given age, in its given cultural
 context, in its given conceptual network, etc., etc.) Even if there
 was not complete agreement about each interpretation, there was
 complete consensus on this. This was demonstrated by the endur¬
 ing “popularity” of Theodor Bernhardt Welter’s book Lehrbuch
 der Weltgeschichte für Gymnasien und höhere Bürgerschulen, which
 was incredibly widely read by German-speaking people: it first
 appeared in 1826 and by 1873 had been through 31(!) editions. We
 find this book even in Nietzsche's library (see Campioni’s edition
 of the library). Nietzsche owned the 14th edition (1854). Welter
 distinguishes five races among “primitive peoples.” These are: Cau¬
 casian, Mongolian, Negro, American (by which he means Native
 American), and Malay. All of these, of course, are contrasted with
 the spiritually rich and educated European. In Welter’s Lehrbuch, on
 the subject of the religion of the “primitive peoples,” we find that,
 “like the ancient Germans,” they worship gods without temples,
 statues, and altars, and people pray to the celestial bodies, and
 especially to fire. This one-sided picture is challenged by Miiller’s