Skip to main content
mobile

L'Harmattan Open Access platform

  • Search
  • OA Collections
  • L'Harmattan Archive
Englishen
  • Françaisfr
  • Deutschde
  • Magyarhu
LoginRegister
  • Volume Overview
  • Page
  • Text
  • Metadata
  • Clipping
Preview
022_000076/0000

On the Concept of Alien

  • Preview
  • PDF
  • Show Metadata
  • Show Permalink
Author
Zoltán Gyenge
Field of science
Filozófia, filozófiatörténet / Philosophy, history of philosophy (13033)
Type of publication
monográfia
022_000076/0066
  • Volume Overview
  • Page
  • Text
  • Metadata
  • Clipping
Page 67 [67]
  • Preview
  • Show Permalink
  • JPG
  • TIFF
  • Prev
  • Next
022_000076/0066

OCR

develop as one, so when they were mated together in a close embrace, they were not two, but a two-fold form, so that they could not be called male or female, and seemed neither or either. (Ovid 2000, IV. 367-400) Not two but one. Do not let the fact that in this world this can only be perfectly accomplished through death bother you. Hero and Leander, Abelard and Héloïse: we could continue this list, as I have described. Death ends the difference between two bodies. It ends the “and.” The curtain exists between perceiver and perceived. Is it like Hegel’s curtain, which only shows what is hidden deep? Or is it like the curtain of Parrhasius, which seems to cover something,” while the reality is the curtain itself. And the truth is the self itself. The other, which is oppositional at first, later becomes the subject of reconciliation, through which the same recognizes itself, or else it recreates its solid sense of self by destroying itself. It finds perfect reconciliation in death, not in the world, and not in the unity of the spirit. Then what or who is the alien? And what or who is the enemy? 31 Pliny tells the story in his Historia Naturalis in which two Greek painters, Zeuxis and Parrhasius, entered a contest to see which of them is the greater and more capable painter. Zeuxis, who was justly famous for his paintings, painted such a lifelike bunch of grapes onto the canvas that the birds landed on it and tried to pluck the grapes. Encouraged by this judgment of the birds, Zeuxis stepped in front of the canvas of Parrhasius and said that it was impossible that the painting behind the other artist’s curtain could ever match his own, and he told him to draw the curtain aside to show what he had created. This is when Parrhasius told Zeuxis that he could not, as the curtain was the painting. According to the story, Zeuxis admitted defeat. He admitted that while he had been capable of fooling the birds, Parrhasius had fooled him, the painter. According to the other variant of the story, Zeuxis painted a boy carrying a bunch of grapes that were so realistic the birds landed on them. When he heard this, Parrhasius became so enraged he exclaimed that he can fool not only the birds but people as well. This is why, when Zeuxis went to the gallery and sought a painting, he said that it was there behind the curtain. When Zeuxis tried to draw the curtain aside, it was revealed that the curtain itself was the painting.

Structural

Custom

Image Metadata

Image width
1595 px
Image height
2422 px
Image resolution
300 px/inch
Original File Size
908.24 KB
Permalink to jpg
022_000076/0066.jpg
Permalink to ocr
022_000076/0066.ocr

Links

  • L'Harmattan Könyvkiadó
  • Open Access Blog
  • Kiadványaink az MTMT-ben
  • Kiadványaink a REAL-ban
  • CrossRef Works
  • ROR ID

Contact

  • L'Harmattan Szerkesztőség
  • Kéziratleadási szabályzat
  • Peer Review Policy
  • Adatvédelmi irányelvek
  • Dokumentumtár
  • KBART lists
  • eduID Belépés

Social media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

L'Harmattan Open Access platform

LoginRegister

User login

eduId Login
I forgot my password
  • Search
  • OA Collections
  • L'Harmattan Archive
Englishen
  • Françaisfr
  • Deutschde
  • Magyarhu