Skip to main content
mobile

L'Harmattan Open Access platform

  • Search
  • OA Collections
  • L'Harmattan Archive
Englishen
  • Françaisfr
  • Deutschde
  • Magyarhu
LoginRegister
  • Volume Overview
  • Page
  • Text
  • Metadata
  • Clipping
Preview
022_000076/0000

On the Concept of Alien

  • Preview
  • PDF
  • Show Metadata
  • Show Permalink
Author
Zoltán Gyenge
Field of science
Filozófia, filozófiatörténet / Philosophy, history of philosophy (13033)
Type of publication
monográfia
022_000076/0057
  • Volume Overview
  • Page
  • Text
  • Metadata
  • Clipping
Page 58 [58]
  • Preview
  • Show Permalink
  • JPG
  • TIFF
  • Prev
  • Next
022_000076/0057

OCR

Thetwo willthus be one. The difference between Hegel and Pseudo Kierkegaard? is precisely that, while for Hegel self-consciousness begins here, for Pseudo Kierkegaard self-consciousness becomes real and authentic in destruction. Or, more precisely, in death. Because in this case, death justifies the self’s existence. (How many of us will treat death like this? Very few.) He perishes in recognition. He dies by dreaming himself into poetry. The fate of Narcissus is that, by recognizing the unity of the two worlds, he realizes precisely that he can no longer be divided into two. That is, his only chance is to fall. His blood does not rain useless to the ground. It is as if Pseudo Kierkegaard is looking at Caravaggio’s famous painting Narcissus (1597-99) as he writes about Narcissus, even though the unfortunate Dane was notoriously not interested in the fine arts: “But looking at the moment changes everything. It brings the storm that completely shatters the soul of the young man. Seeing the image does not mean knowledge, much less understanding, only its infinity increases desire.” Pseudo Kierkegaard 2012. ibid) Is this life? Who knows? Rather, it is destruction itself. Narcissus becomes a work of art. The stranger, the other will become one with the self. And from the blood of narcissus come the flowers bearing his name.”° Caravaggio’s picture is perfect (among other things) because it depicts Narcissus alone. There is no Echo, no nymph, not even a dog beside him. No. Being Narcissus is a lonely “occupation.” Besides Caravaggio, few have perceived this. Perhaps Gyula Bencztir is an exception. The slightly twisted figure 25 Pseudo Kierkegaard is an interesting figure. On the one hand, he is a devoted Hegelian. On the other, he almost definitely uses Hegel and Schelling in an unscientific way, on the principle of “let it fall where it may.” He cannot be taken very seriously. 26 Flowers growing from blood is a favorite motif in Greek mythology. Hyacinth, the son of Spartan king Amyclus, was the lover of Apollo, who accidentally struck him with a discus and killed him. From the blood of Hyacinth grew the crimson hyacinth flower.

Structural

Custom

Image Metadata

Image width
1595 px
Image height
2422 px
Image resolution
300 px/inch
Original File Size
908.54 KB
Permalink to jpg
022_000076/0057.jpg
Permalink to ocr
022_000076/0057.ocr

Links

  • L'Harmattan Könyvkiadó
  • Open Access Blog
  • Kiadványaink az MTMT-ben
  • Kiadványaink a REAL-ban
  • CrossRef Works
  • ROR ID

Contact

  • L'Harmattan Szerkesztőség
  • Kéziratleadási szabályzat
  • Peer Review Policy
  • Adatvédelmi irányelvek
  • Dokumentumtár
  • KBART lists
  • eduID Belépés

Social media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

L'Harmattan Open Access platform

LoginRegister

User login

eduId Login
I forgot my password
  • Search
  • OA Collections
  • L'Harmattan Archive
Englishen
  • Françaisfr
  • Deutschde
  • Magyarhu