Page 44 [44]
OCR
In contrast to the Amelés, in which the water of forgetfulness flows, the Mnemosyne contains the water of remembrance. According to other writers, everyone drinks from the waters of both rivers, but it is important to do so in the right balance. That is to say, for the Greeks remembrance is grace, but it is at least as much of a mercy to forget. It is no coincidence the sources of the two rivers are found in the same place. And, of course, it is no accident that the mother of the muse is oblivion. To put it in Nietzsche’s terms, the Greeks created art so that they could repress the horror of existence, so that we may at least temporarily forget it, though not permanently. We must also keep in mind that Plato accurately describes forgetting in the Myth of Er. He words it as those who were not prevented from doing so by their common sense drank deeply from the river of forgetfulness. (Rep. 621.b.) Obviously, as we also see in the Phaedrus (Plato 1972. 249.e.), cognition is nothing but remembrance (äväuvnoic). For Hegel also, cognition is remembering—Kierkegaard will object to this in due course—but it is more than that: it is simultaneously remembrance (Erinnerung, &väjıvnoıg) and internalization, the realization of itself (Er-innerung) (PoS. p.467. PdG. p- 591.)”. All this expresses that cognition (remembrance) is not simply epistemological. It does not only refer to learning things from the past, but is also ontological, as it creates. “The goal of the movement is the revelation of depth itself, and this is the absolute concept.” Or “the aim, absolute knowing, or spirit knowing itself as spirit. (Ibid. p. 467.) The wording, that the spirit finds its path in the memory of spirits, is again a very eloquent expression of the true content of remembering. 22 This is impossible to translate in practice. “Erinnerung” means remembering or memory. Er-inner-ung (inwardizing re-collection) is, however, the separated “er” third person singular (he/she), while “inner” means inner.
