OCR Output

Schulman, A. R. “The Royal Butler Ramessesemperré‘.” Journal of the American Research
Center in Egypt 13, 1976, 121.

Davies, B. G. Ramesside Inscriptions. Translated and Annotated: Notes and Comments. Vol.
IV. Merenptah and the Late Nineteenth Dynasty. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, 2014, 91-92.

[53.7] Relief fragment, Cairo, private collection’

Inscription above the man

[... ...] (x#1) Tsntr jrp (x+2) Sdh! (x+3) hr.t nb(.t) nfr(.t) n (x+4) Wsjr Bj-hw hr (wnmj) nswt
(x+5) wb3 nswt R’-mss-"m]-(x+6)pr-R“ m3°-hrw m htp

[x lines lose ... ] (x+1) incense, wine, pomegranate (x+2) wine, and (x+3) every good pro¬
vision, for (x+4) the Osiris, Fanbearer on the King’s <Right> hand, (x+5) Royal Cupbearer
(wb3 nswt), Ramesses-em-(x+6)Per-Re, justified in peace.

Text edition:
Kitchen, K. A. Ramesside Inscriptions. Historical and Biographical. Vol. IV. B. H. Blackwell,
Oxford, 1982, 106.

Translation:
Kitchen, K. A. Ramesside Inscriptions, Translated and Annotated, Translations. Vol. IV. Mer¬
enptah and the Late Nineteenth Dynasty. Blackwell, Oxford, 2003a, 82.

Publication:

-c»

Schulman, A. R. “The Royal Butler Ramessesemperré‘.” Journal of the American Research

Center in Egypt 13, 1976, 122.
Davies, B. G. Ramesside Inscriptions. Translated and Annotated: Notes and Comments. Vol.
IV. Merenptah and the Late Nineteenth Dynasty. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, 2014, 92.

[53.8] Relief fragment, Villa Torlonia No. 557°”
[...] [wb3 nswr”] (+1) tpj n hm=f (x+2) R°-mss-m-pr-(x+3)R° m3-hrw

“5 Translation is after Kitchen, 2003a, 82.

1016 Translation is after Kitchen, 2003a, 83.

‘7 ‘Whilst Kitchen restores this title as the rarely-attested wdpw-nsw tpy n hi,f, “First royal cupbearer
of His Majesty” (cf. KRI IV, 105, 9, 15), an equally plausible restoration would be whm-nsw tpy n
hm f, “First Royal Herald of His Majesty”, another office that Ramesses-em-Per-Re is known to have
held (cf. KRI IV, 104:6, 10, 13; see above, $161)’. Davies, 2014, 93. The note of Davies has to be cor¬
rected regarding the title “First royal cupbearer of His Majesty”, as the correct reading must be wb3
nswt tpj n hm=f, since wdpw nswt is never attested with the ranking suffix tpj.