Oldal 241 [241]
Kings during 1905/1906 shows a more complete state of it.* The lower right and the
upper left edges were lost somewhere between its discovery and its acquisition by the
museum. Schulman, Malek and Peden assign the stele to Nakhtamun,** however, in
the photograph the name of the owner is more visible and does not support their assump¬
tion, but makes Parenakht a potential candidate for the ownership.
Peden suggests that Parenakht also appears on the ostracon CG 25311 together with
Amenkhau and Atumnakht, without any title, however, there is no indication of his
presence in the text.
Parenakht is designated as wdpw nswt ‘royal wdpw’ on all of his remains, which in the
cases of the ostracon and the papyrus coincides, and in the case of the stele assumes his
participation in a particular mission ordered by the ruler.’ His only other functional
title is s§ nswt ‘royal scribe’, which appears on his stele.
IIL.85. Nebmaatreper-?
Date: Ramesses V / Ramesses VI / Ramesses VII (based on the date of the ostracon)
Genealogy: unknown
Tomb: unknown
Remains: — ostracon, Valley of the Kings, BTdK 659
Functional title: wdpw nswt
An ostracon (BTdK 659) found in one of the huts of the workmen in the Valley of the
Kings mentions wdpw nswt ‘royal wdpw’ Nebmaatreper-? and reports on his visit to
inspect the work on the royal tomb with his colleague, another wdpw nswt ‘royal wdpw’,
Kar. The text also informs us that the two officials performed a water libation in devo¬
tion to the king. Unfortunately, the inscription gives only the 2" year as a date of the
visit, but not the name of the ruler himself. According to Dorn, Ramesses V, Ramesses VI
and Ramesses VII might be the candidates, most likely Ramesses VI or Ramesses VII.”
As for the name of Nebmaatreper-?, Dorn notes that all the recognizable elements of
°8 Reeves, 1984, 234, pl. 34c.
844 Schulman, 1986, 201; Malek, 1988, 135; Peden, 1994b, 60.
* Peden, 1994b, 59. The only possible explanation for Peden’s assumption is that he misread the last
word of the ostracon p3 hr [...] ‘the tomb [...]’ as P3-r‘[...].
For further discussion on the usage of the two titles, see p. 91.
#7 Dorn, 2011, 411.
846