Page 104 [104]
OCR
BRIGITTE SCHIGL THE DARK FIELD OF SUPERVISION AND COACHING At the Austrian Post Graduate “Danube University” in Krems, Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health we strive to implement complex research designs as demanded by psychotherapy or supervision processes. As a main topic we were interested in risks, side effects and damages that psychotherapy or supervision can implicate. We could realise a multi-method study in the years 2008-2012 concerning the dark field of psychotherapy” and from 2008-2011 in cooperation with the University of Amsterdam and the EAG Hückeswagen an online data collection concerning injuries and damages in supervision and training supervision. Besides these online data, some students of the Supervision & Coaching MSc.-course were conducting research projects on other perspectives and aspects on the dark field of supervision. So we have got results from different points of view with different research methods which give a first impression on hidden aspects of supervision and coaching™. Trying to define... As we stated before’ the scientific research on supervision should result in quality management-factors such as effectiveness, efficiency, and harmlessness. The last point is also of an ethic concern. We assumed that if supervision should be effective there may occur wanted as well as unwanted effects in the process. + First we have the planned and followed required effects of the supervision process — for example a better cooperation of the team or better dealing with demanding clients. Anton Leitner — Brigitte Schigl —- Michael Martens (eds.), Wirkung Risiken und Nebenwirkungen von Psychotherapie. Ein Beipackzettel ftir PatientInnen und TherapeutInnen, Wien, facultas. wuv, 2014. Jutta Ehrhardt — Hilarion G. Petzold, Wenn Supervisionen schaden - explorative Untersuchungen im Dunkelfeld “riskanter supervisorischer Praxis”, Supervision: Theorie — Praxis — Forschung, 3 (2014), www.fpi-publikation.de/images/stories/downloads/supervision/ ehrhardt-petzold-wenn-supervisionen-schaden-_explorative-untersuchungen-riskantepraxis-03-2014.pdf, accessed 20 July 2015. Brigitte Schigl, Wie gefahrlich kann Supervision sein?, Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 2013/01, 35-49, DOI: 10.1007/s11613-013-0312-6. Anton Leitner — Hilarion G. Petzold - Susanne Orth - Johanna Sieper — Petra Telsemeyer, Mythos Supervision. Zur Notwendigkeit von “konzeptkritischen” Untersuchungen im Hellund Dunkelfeld zu Wirkungen, Nebenwirkungen, Risiken und Rechtsverletzungen in der supervisorischen Praxis, 2004, www.donau- uni.ac.at/imperia/md/content/studium/umwelt_ medizin/psymed/artikel/mythsu04.pdf, accessed 19 July 2015. * 102 +
