Oldal 197 [197]
DEVELOPING EU CRIMINAL LAW — SOME PERSONAL REFLECTIONS ON 9 MAY
The transfer of criminal proceedings, perhaps in the broader context of rules
on conflicts of jurisdiction and the principle of ne bis in idem;
Cross-border use and admissibility of certain types of evidence;
Protecting vulnerable suspects and accused persons;
Updating Union law on corruption and environmental crime;
Extending the material competence of the EPPO and harmonising its pro¬
cedures;
Developing minimum standards on pre-trial detention and on compensation
for unlawful detention;
Continuing work on victims’ rights, including access to justice and com¬
pensation;
Enhancing convergence and cooperation between Eurojust, the European
Judicial Network (EJN), and the EPPO;
Issuing or revising handbooks on mutual recognition instruments to help
practitioners implement CJEU case law;
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in criminal proceedings;
Enhancing the digitalisation and interoperability of criminal justice autho¬
rities and EU bodies.
6
Ban Tamas — Bard Karoly, Az Európai Emberi Jogok Egyezménye és a magyar jog: 5., 6.
és 7. cikkek, Acta Humana: Hungarian Centre for Human Rights Publications 3 (1992)
3-162; Bard Karoly, European Criminal Law?, in Lahti, Raimo (ed.), Towards a Rational
and Humane Criminal Policy = Kohti rationaalista ja humaania kriminaalipolitiikkaa:
Dedicated to Inkeri Anttila = omistettu Inkeri Anttilalle, Helsinki, European Institute for
Crime Prevention and Control (HEUNI), 1996, 241-253; Bard Karoly, Fairness in Criminal
Proceedings: Article Six of the European Human Rights Convention in a Comparative
Perspective, Budapest, Magyar Hivatalos Kozlonykiad6, 2008; Bard Karoly, Az áldozatok
méltósága és a vádlottak jogai: összehasonlító jogi tanulmány, Budapest, HVG-ORAC Lap¬
és Könyvkiadó Kft., 2021.
+ 195 *