Page 47 [47]
OCR
CHAPTER ONE: LIVING THROUGH DRAMA represent a particular person to others. O’Neill states that though the first three categories are predominant, all five can be present in her process drama. She argues for the strong presence of connection between the participants’ life and the fiction, and also for the artistic dimension to be present. Experience arises from the interaction of people and their environment, and art celebrates that interaction with clarity and intensity. The participants in the drama process bring to it their own experience of the world. The drama teacher must build a bridge for the pupils between their experience and the meaning that is embodied in the drama. If the teacher fails, the work will be lacking in integrity and will be effective neither educationally nor aesthetically. In structuring the process according to aesthetic principles, the teacher is likely to achieve both educational and artistic objectives. The pupils will be able to make sense of their experience in the world and organise their experience in the drama process into the unity, coherence and significance of art. O’Neill claims that to achieve educational aims the work needs to be structured according to aesthetic principles. The question is what are the pedagogical aims achieved through this form of LTD. I look at this more closely in the following section. Spectators of Themselves Making Fiction Among the different positions from which the participants can experience situations in process drama we can find that of the spectator as well. O’Neill considers the audience an integral part of theatre and consciously creates possibilities of spectating the unfolding events." For example in Frank Miller after an improvised pair work four people join up and one member of each pair listens to his previous partner discussing his fears related to Miller. This second improvised discussion will obviously be reflecting on the previous one, those being talked about will be involved but some distance for observation and reflection is also created. O’Neill argues that “the pervasive elements of watching seemed to allow for a greater degree of feeling in the group”.’* This mode of observation of the drama being made creates a different type of involvement and offers yet another angle of engaging with the problem. It also offers a reflection from within the fiction on previous events or tasks, creating a form of self-spectatorship as well. In Frank Miller the participants see a fictional world built up with their participation, with the use of their 156 Cecily O’Neill: Drama and the Web of Form, in Philip Taylor — Christina D. Warner, (eds.): Structure and Spontaneity, the Process Drama of Cecily O’Neill, Stoke on Trent, Trentham Books, 2006, 72. 157 O’Neill: Drama Worlds, 112. 158 Ibid., 124. +46 +
