Primary Sources
Abbot, George: An exposition vpon the prophet Ionah Contained in certaine sermons, preached in S. Maries church in Oxford, 1600.
Anonymous: The True Chronicle Historie of King Leir, and his three daughters, Gonorill, Ragan and Cordella. As it hath bene diners and sundry times lately acted. London, Printed by Simon Stafford for Iohn Wright, and are to bee sold at his shop at Christes Church dore, next Newsgate Market, 1605.
Affinati, Giacomo: The dumbe diuine speaker, or: Dumbe speaker of Diuinity A learned and excellent treatise, in praise of silence: shewing both the dignitie, and defectes of the tongue. Written in Italian, by Fra. Giacomo Affinati d’Acuto Romano. And truelie translated by A.M., At London, Printed [by R. Bradock] for William Leake, dwelling in Paules churchyard, at the signe of the Holy- ghost, 1605.
Averell, W. (William): A Dyall for dainty Darlings, rockt in the cradle of Securitie. A Glasse for all disobedient Sonnes to looke in. A Myrrour for vertuous Maydes. A Booke right excellent, garnished with many woorthy examples, and learned aucthorities, most needefull for this tyme present, London, Thomas Hackette, 1584.
Barnes, Barnabe: Foure bookes of offices enabling privat persons for the speciall seruice of all good princes and policies. London, Printed at the charges of George Bishop, T. Adams, and C. Burbie, 1606.
Bond, Ronald B. (ed.): Certain Sermons and Homilies (1547) and A Homily Against Disobedience and Wilful Rebellion (1570), Toronto, Buffalo, London, Toronto University Press, 1987. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442632202
Camden, William: Remaines of a Greater Work Concerning Britaine, the in- habitants thereof, their Languages, Names, Surnames, Empreses, Wise Speech- es, Poësies, and Epitaphes, London, printed by G. E., 1605.
Combe, Thomas (trans.): The Theater of Fine Devices, containing an hundred morall Emblemes, London, printed by Richard Field, 1614.
Forset, Edward: A Comparative Discovrse of the Bodies Natvral and Politique. Wherein out of the Principles of Nature, is set forth the true forme of a Commonweale, with the dutie of Subiects, and the right of the Soueraigne: together with many good points of Politicall learning, mentioned in a Briefe after the Preface, London, printed for Iohn Bill, 1606.
Hall, Joseph: Characters of Vertues and Vices in two Books, London, printed by Melch. Bradwood, 1608.
Higgins, John: The First Parte of the Mirour for Magistrates contayning the falles of the first infortunate princes of this lande: from the comming of Brute to the incarnation of our sauiour and redemer Iesu Christe, London, 1574.
James I, King of England: Basilikon Doron or His Maiesties Instrvctions to His Dearest Sonne, Henrie the Prince, London, imprinted by Richard Field, for Iohn Norton, according to the Copie printed at Edenburgh, 1603.
John of Salisbury: The statesman’s book of John of Salisbury, being the fourth, fifth, and sixth books, and selections from the seventh and eighth books of the Policraticus, trans. John Dickenson, New York, Russell & Russel, 1963.
Jonson, Ben: To the memory of my beloued, the Avthor Mr. William Shakespeare: and what he hath left vs, in Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, histories & tragedies, published according to the true originall copies, London, printed by Isaac Jaggard and Edward Blount, 1623.
La Perrière, Guillaume: Theatre des bons engins, Paris, Denis Janot, n.d. (1544).
The journals of all the Parliaments during the reign of Queen Elizabeth both of the House of Lords and House of Commons, collected by Sir Simonds d’Ewes, knight and baronet of Stow Hall in Suffolk, revised and published in 1682 by his nephew, the lawyer and antiquary Paul Bowes, London, printed for John Starkey, 1682.
De Montenay, Georgette: Emblematum Christianorum Centuria / Cent Emblemes Chrestiennes, Zurich, Christoph Froschover, 1584.
Norton, Thomas – Sackville, Thomas: The Tragedy of Gorboduc, imprinted at London in Fletestreet at the sign of the Falcon by William Griffith, 1565.
Puttenham, George: The Arte of English Poesie 1589, A Scolar Press Facsimile, Menston, The Scolar Press Limited, 1968.
Saresberiensis, Joannis: Policraticus Sive de Nugis Curialium et Vestigiis Philosophorum, ed. Clement C. I. Webb, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1909.
Shak-speare, M. William: His True Chronicle Historie of the life and death of King Lear and his three Daughters. With the vnfortunate life of Edgar, sonne and heire to the Earle of Gloster, and his sullen and assumed humor of Tom of Bedlam, London, 1608.
Shakespeare, William: Coriolanus, ed. Philip Brockbank, The Arden Shakespeare. Second series, London–New York, Routledge, 1994.
Shakespeare, William: King Lear, The Arden Edition of the Works of William Shakespeare, ed. Kenneth Muir, London–New York, Routledge, 1977.
Shakespeare, William: King Lear, ed. Reginald Armstrong Foakes, The Arden Shakespeare. Third series, London, Thomson Learning, 1997.
Shakespeare, William: King Lear. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare. Vol 5, ed. Horace Howard Furness, Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Company, 1880.
Shakespeare, William: The Arden Shakespeare Complete Works. Arden Shakespeare Complete Works, ed. Richard Proudfoot, Ann Thompson, David Scott Kastan, London, Cengage Learning EMEA, 2000.
Skelton, John: Magnyfycence, in Greg Walker (ed.): Medieval Drama: An Anthology, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 2000, 349–408.
Sidney, Sir Philip: “An Apology for Poetry.” English Critical Texts, ed. F. Enright – L. Chickera, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1962, 20–45.
Winthrop, John: A Modell of Christian Charity, Boston, Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society, 1838, 31–48.
Secondary Sources
Archambault, Paul: The Analogy of the “Body” in Renaissance Political Literature, Bibliotèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 29 (1967), 21–53.
Astington, John: The Globe, the Court and Measure for Measure, Shakespeare Survey 52 (2003), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521660742.011
Axton, Mary: The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession, London, Royal Historical Society, 1977.
Baldo, Jonathan: Partial to Synecdoche (Ophelia’s Rhetoric), in Jonathan Baldo: The Unmasking of Drama, Contested Representation in Shakespeare’s Tragedies, Detroit, Wayne State University Press, 1996, 44–70.
Baldwin, T. W.: Shakespeare’s Small Latin and Less Greek, Urbana, Illinois University Press, 1944.
Barkan, Leonard: Nature’s Work of Art. The Human Body as Image of the World, New Haven–London, Yale University Press, 1975.
Baroll, John Leeds: Politics, Plague and Shakespeare’s Theater, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1991.
Bergeron, David M.: Deadly Letters in King Lear, Philological Quarterly 72 (1993), 157–177.
Bevington, David M.: The Pioneering Contributions of Bale and Skelton, in David M. Bevington (ed.): From Mankind to Marlowe. Growth of Structure in the Popular Drama of Tudor England, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1962.
Bradley, A. C.: Shakespearean Tragedy. Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22059-5_7
Brayton, Dan: Angling in the Lake of Darkness: Possession, Dispossession, and the Politics of Discovery in King Lear, EHL 70 (2003), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2003.0012
Bullough, Geoffrey: Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare Vol. VII Major Tragedies: Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, London, Routledge, 1973, 269–308.
Camden, William: Remaines of a Greater Work Concerning Britaine, the inhabitants thereof, their Languages, Names, Surnames, Empreses, Wise Speeches, Poësies, and Epitaphes, London, printed by G. E., 1605.
Campbell, John Lord: King Lear, in John Lord Campbell: Shakespeare’s Legal Acquirements, New York, D. Appleton & Co., 1859, 97–103.
Campbell, Lily Bess: Poetical Mirrors of History, in Lilly Bess Campbell: Shakespeare’s “Histories”: Mirrors of Elizabethan Policy, London–New York, Routledge, 2004 [1947], 106–116.
Clegg, Cyndia Susan: King Lear and the Early Seventeenth-century Print Culture, in Jeffrey Kahan (ed.): King Lear: New Critical Essays. Volume 33 of Shakespeare criticism, New York, Routledge, 2008, 155–184.
Clemen, W. H.: King Lear, in W. H. Clemen: The Development of Shakespeare’s Imagery, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1951, 133–153.
Colie, Rosalie: Shakespeare’s Living Art, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1974.
Curtius, Ernst Robert: European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, trans. Willard R. Trask, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1973.
Daly, Peter M.: The Case for the 1593 Edition of Thomas Combe’s Theater of Fine Devices, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 49 (1986), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.2307/751306
Debax, Jean–Paul: Complicity and Hierarchy: a Tentative Definition of the Interlude Genus, in Peter Happé – Wim Hüsken (eds.): Interludes and Early Modern Society. Studies in Gender, Power and Theatricality, Amsterdam– New York, Rodopi, 2007, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401205894_003
Desmet, Christy: Character Criticism, in Stanley Wells–Lena Cowen Orlin (eds.): Shakespeare. An Oxford Guide, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press, 2003, 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199245222.003.0026
Desmet, Christy: To See Feelingly: Vision, Voice, and Dramatic Illusion in King Lear, in Christy Desmet: Reading Shakespeare’s Characters: Rhetoric, Ethics, and Identity, Amherst, Massachusetts University Press, 1992, 112–133.
Dodd, William: Impossible Worlds: What Happens in King Lear, Act 1, Scene 1?, Shakespeare Quarterly 50 (1999), 477–507. https://doi.org/10.2307/2902281
Elton, W. R.: King Lear and the Gods, Lexington, University Press of Kentucky, 1988.
Elton, W. R.: Shakespeare and the Thought of his Age, in Stanley Wells (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Shakespearean Studies, Cambridge–New York, Cambridge University Press, 1986, 17–33.
Evans, John X.: Erasmian Folly and Shakespeare’s King Lear: A Study in Humanist Intertextuality, Moreana 27:103 (1990), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.3366/more.1990.27.3.3
Fabiny, Tibor: The Eye as a Metaphor in Shakespearean Tragedy: Hamlet, Cordelia and Edgar: Blinded Parents’ Seeing Children, in K. Kürtösi – J. Pál (eds.): Celebrating Comparability, Szeged, JATE University Press, 1994, 461–478.
Floyd–Wilson, Mary – Greenfield, Matthew – Paster, Gail Kern – Pollard, Tanya –Rowe, Katherine – Yates, Julian: Shakespeare and Em- bodiment: An E-Conversation, Literature Compass 2 (2005), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2005.00180.x
Foakes, Reginald Armstrong: Introduction, in William Shakespeare: King Lear, Reginald Armstrong Foakes (ed.), The Arden Shakespeare. Third series, London, Thomson Learning, 1997, 1–151.
Foakes, Reginald Armstrong: Hamlet versus Lear. Cultural Politics and Shakespeare’s Art, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518867
Földváry, Kinga: Humanist–Human–Humane? Poverty and Humanitartian Aid in Elizabethan England, in Zsolt Almási – Mike Pincombe (eds.): Writing the Other: Humanism versus Barbarism in Tudor England, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars, 2008, 216–230.
Fraser, Russel: Anarchy and Order, in Russel Fraser: Shakespeare’s Poetics in Relation to King Lear, London, Routledge–Kegan Paul, 1962, 61–84.
Frye, Northrop: Northrop Frye on Shakespeare, ed. Robert Sandler, New Haven– London, Yale University Press, 1986.
Freeman, Donald C.: “According to my bond:” King Lear and Re-cognition, Language and Literature 2 (1993), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709300200101, https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709300200204
Gillespie, Stuart: Shakespeare’s Books, Athlone Shakespeare Dictionary Series, London–New Brunswick, NJ, Athlone, 2001. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472555328
Grabes, Herbert: The Mutable Glass. Mirror-imagery in Titles and Texts of the Middle Ages and English Renaissance, trans. Gordon Collier, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Greenblatt, Stephen: Shakespeare and the Exorcists, in Patricia Parker and Geoffrey Hartman (eds.): Shakespeare and the Question of Theory, New York, Methuen, 1985, 163–187.
Gulstad, William: Mock-trial or witch-trial in King Lear?, Notes and Queries 41:4 (1994), 494–497. https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/41-4-494
Hale, David George: The Body Politic. A Political Metaphor in Renaissance English Literature, The Hague–Paris, Mouton, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112415146
Hammond, Paul: James I’s Homosexuality and the Revision of the Folio Text of King Lear, Notes and Queries 44:1 (1997), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/44-1-62
Hankins, John Erskine: Backgrounds of Shakespeare’s Thought, Hassocks, Sussex, The Harvest Press, 1978.
Happé, Peter: Allegorical Kings as Staged by Skelton and Lindsay, in Peter Happé (ed.): Tudor Theatre. Allegory in the Theatre. L’allégorie au theater, Collection Theta, Volume 5., Bern, Peter Lang, 2000, 77–89.
Happé, Peter: Fansy and Foly: the Drama of Fools in Magnyfyncence, Comparative Drama 27:4 (1994), 426–452. https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.1993.0034
Harris, Jonathan Gil: Foreign Bodies and the Body Politic. Discourses of Social Pathology in Early Modern England, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Hattaway, Michael: Tragedy and Political Authority, in Claire Elizabeth McEachern (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Shakespearean Tragedy, Cambridge, Cambdrige University Press, 2002, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521790093.006
Hillman, David: Visceral Knowledge, in David Hillman – Carla Mazzio (eds.): The Body in Parts. Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, New York–London, Routledge, 1997, 81–106.
Hotine, Margaret: Lear’s Fit of the Mother, Notes and Queries 22:6 (1981), 138–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/28-2-138
Hughes, Ted: Shakespeare and the Goddess of Complete Being, London, Faber & Faber, 1992.
Ioppolo, Grace: “A Jointure more or less:” Re-measuring The True Chronicle History of King Leir and his three daughters, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 17 (2005), 165–179.
Ioppolo, Grace: (ed.), A Routledge Literary Sourcebook on William Shakespeare’s King Lear, London–New York, Routledge, 2003.
Jackson, Kenneth S.: King Lear and the Search for Bethlem (Bedlam) Hospital, in Kenneth S. Jackson: Separate Theaters: Bethlem (“Bedlam”) Hospital and the Shakespearean Stage, Newark, University of Delaware Press, 2005, 154–182.
Jauss, Hans Robert: Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory, in Hans Robert Jauss: Toward an Aesthetic of Reception, trans. Timothy Bahti, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1982, 3–45.
Kahn, Victoria: English Machiavellism, in Victoria Kahn: Machiavellian Rhetoric from the Counter-reformation to Milton, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1994, 85–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821280
Kallendorf, Craig: King Lear and the Figures of Speech, in Craig Kallendorf (ed.): Landmark Essays on Rhetoric and Literature, Mahwah, NJ, Hermagoras Press, 1999, 101–116.
Kantorowitz, Ernst H.: The King’s Two Bodies: a Study in Medieval Political Theology, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1957.
Kiss, Attila: Demetaphorization on the Early Modern Emblematic Stage, in Tóth Sára –Kókai Nagy Viktor – Marjai Éva – Mudriczki Judit – Turi Zita – Arday- Janka Judit (eds.): Szólító Szavak / The Power of Words: Tanulmányok Fabiny Tibor hatvanadik születésnapjára / Papers in Honor of Tibor Fabiny’s Sixtieth Birthday, Budapest, Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem–L’Harmattan Kiadó, 2015, 295–304.
Kleineke, Wilhelm: Englische Fürstenspigel vom Policraticus Johanns von Salisbury bis zum Basilikon Doron König Jakobs I., Halle (Saale), Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1937.
Knowles, Richard: How Shakespeare Knew King Leir, Shakespeare Survey 55 (2002), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521815878.002
Knowles, Richard: The Evolution of the Texts of Lear, in Jeffrey Kahan (ed.): King Lear: New Critical Essays. Volume 33 of Shakespeare criticism, New York, Routledge, 2008, 124–154.
Lisak, Catherine: An Essay in Comparison: Shakespeare’s «Technical Inventiveness» in the Light of George Puttenham’s Arte, in Shakespeare and Ses Contemporains. Société Française Shakespeare, Actes du Congrès de 2002, 2002, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.4000/shakespeare.800
Mack, Maynard: King Lear in Our Time, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1972.
Mangan, Michael: Elizabethan and Jacobean Tragedy, in Michael Mangan: A Preface to Shakespeare’s Tragedies, London–NewYork, Longman, 1991, 58–104. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839738-7
Marcus, Leah S.: Retrospective: King Lear on St. Stephen’s Night, 1606, in Leah S. Marcus: Puzzling Shakespeare. Local Reading and its Discontents, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press, 1988, 148–159.
McAlindon, Tom: Tragedy, King Lear and the Politics of the Heart, Shake- speare Survey 44 (1991), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521413567.009
McDowell, Sean: The View from the Interior: The New Body Scholarship in Renaissance/Early Modern Studies, Literature Compass 3:4 (2006), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00346.x
Mendonça, Barbara Heliodora Carneiro De: The Influence of Gorboduc on King Lear, Shakespeare Survey 13 (1966), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521064260.005
Muir, Kenneth: Samuel Harsnett and King Lear, The Review of English Studies 2:5 (1951), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/res/II.5.11
Najbauer, Noémi Mária: “The Art of Salvation, is but the Art of Memory”:Memory as Art and Devotion in the Sermons of John Donne, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Budapest, 2010.
Norland, Howard B.: Drama in Early Tudor Britain, 1485–1558, Lincoln, NB, University of Nebraska Press, 1995.
Otto, Beatrice K.: Facets of the Fool, in Beatrice K. Otto: Fools are everywhere: the court jester around the world, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2001, 1–46.
Patterson, Annabel M.: “Betweene our sentence and our power:” King Lear and the double text, in Annabel M. Patterson: Censorship and interpretation. The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England, London and Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1984, 58–73.
Patterson, Annabel M.: Shakespeare and the Popular Voice, Cambridge, MA–Oxford, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Phillips, Owen Hood: Trial Scenes, in Owen Hood Phillips: Shakespeare and the Lawyers, London–New York, Routledge, 2005 [1972], 84–90.
Plett, Heinrich F.: Shakespeare and the Ars Rhetorica, in Heinrich F. Plett: Rhetoric and Renaissance Culture, Berlin–New York, Walter de Gruyter, 2004, 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110201895
Potter, Robert: The Summoning of King Lear, in Robert Potter: The English Morality Play, London and Boston, Routledge–Kegan Paul, 1975, 152–170.
Rebhorn, Wayne A.: “His tail at commandment:” George Puttenham and the Carnivalization of Rhetoric, in Walter Jost–Wendy Olmsted (eds.): A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism, Oxford, Blackwell, 2004, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999851.ch6
Rushton, William L.: Shakespeare and the Arte of English Poesie, Liverpool, 1909.
Rolls, Albert: The Theory of the King’s Two Bodies in the Age of Shakespeare, Lewiston, The Edwin Mellen Press, 2000.
Ryan, Michael: A Historicist Reading of King Lear, in Michael Ryan: Literary Theory: a Practical Introduction, Malden, MA, Wiley–Blackwell, 1999, 131–139.
Scattergood, John: Dressing the Part in Magnyfycence: Allegory and Costume, in Peter Happé (ed.): Tudor Theatre. Allegory in the Theatre. L’allégorie au theater, Collection Theta, Volume 5., Bern, Peter Lang, 2000, 55–75.
Schoenfeldt, Michael: Fables of the Belly in Early Modern England, in David Hillman – Carla Mazzio (eds.): The Body in Parts. Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, New York–London, Routledge, 1997, 242–261.
Shapiro, James: The Year of Lear: Shakespeare in 1606, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2015.
Simpson, John A. – Weiner, Edmund S. C. (eds.): The Oxford English Dictionary. OED Online, Oxford University Press, 1989.
Sokol, B. J. – Sokol, Mary: Introduction, in B. J. Sokol – Mary Sokol: Shakespeare, Law, and Marriage, Cambridge–New York, Cambridge University Press, 2003, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511484001
Spinrad, Phoebe S.: “Too Much Liberty:” Measure for Measure and Skelton’s Magnyfycence, Modern Language Quarterly 60:4 (1999), 431–449.
Spurgeon, Caroline F. E.: Shakespeare’s Imagery and What It Tells Us, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1958.
Stallybrass, Peter: Footnotes, in David Hillman – Carla Mazzio (eds.): The Body in Parts. Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern Europe, New York– London, Routledge, 1997, 312–325.
Stewart, Alan: Shakespeare’s Letters, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008.
Strier, Richard – Mazzio, Carla: Two Reponses to “Shakespeare and Embodiment: An E-Conversation,” Literature Compass 3:1 (2005), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2005.00219.x
Szőnyi, György Endre: Matching the “Falles of Princes” and “Machiavell.” Tradition and Subversion in the Historiography and Iconography of Shakespeare’s Histories, in György E. Szőnyi – Rowland Wymer (eds.): The Iconography of Power. Ideas and Images of Rulership on the English Renaissance Stage, Szeged, JATE Press, 2000, 5–31.
Taunton, Nina – Hart, Valerie: King Lear, King James and the Gunpowder Treason of 1605, Renaissance Studies 17 (2003), 695–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-4658.2003.00042.x
Taylor, Gary: The Date and Authorship of the Folio Version, in Gary Taylor – Michael Warren (eds.): The Division of the Kingdoms. Shakespeare’s Two Versions of King Lear, Oxford, Calderon Press, 1983, 351–464.
Taylor, Gary – Warren, Michael (eds.): The Division of the Kingdoms. Shakespeare’s Two Versions of King Lear, Oxford, Calderon Press, 1983.
Taylor, Mark: Letters and Readers in Macbeth, King Lear, and Twelfth Night, Philological Quarterly 69:1 (1990), 31–53.
Tennenhouse, Leonard: The Theatre of Punishment, in Leonard Tennenhouse: Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare’s Genres, New York–London, Methuen, 1986, 102–146.
Tillyard, E. M. W.: The Elizabethan World Picture, London, Chatto & Windus, 1956.
Urkowitz, Steven: Shakespeare’s Revision of King Lear. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1980.
Vickers, Brian: Tragic Prose: Clowns, Villains, Madmen, in Brian Vickers: The Artistry of Shakespeare’s Prose, London, Methuen & Co Ltd, 1968, 331–404.
Vickers, Brian: Rhetoric and Poetics, in C. B. Schmitt – Q. Skinner (eds.): The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, 715–745.
Walker, Greg: A Domestic Drama: John Skelton’s Magnyfycence and the Royal Household, in Greg Walker, Plays of Persuasion: Drama and Politics and the Court of Henry VIII., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991, 60–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897382.004
Walker, Greg: Politics and Morality: The Interludes. Introduction, in Greg Walker (ed.): Medieval Drama: An Anthology, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers, 2000, 301– 303.
Webb, Clement C. J.: The Policraticus of John of Salisbury, Church Quarterly Review 71 (1911), 312–45.
Welsford, Enid: The Fool: His Social and Literary History, Gloucester, MA, Peter Smith, 1966.
Wiles, David: The Vice: from Mankind to the Merchant of Venice, in David Wiles: Shakespeare’s clown: actor and text in the Elizabethan playhouse, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, 1–10.
Ward, B. M.: The Authorship of the Arte of English Poesie: a suggestion, The Review of English Studies 1:3 (1925), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/res/os-I.3.284
Warren, Roger: The Folio Omission of the Mock Trial. Motives and Con- sequences, in Roger Warren: The Division of the Kingdoms. Shakespeare’s Two Versions of King Lear, Oxford, Calderon Press, 1983, 45–57.
Willcock, Gladys Doidge – Walker, Alice: Introduction, in George Puttenham: The Arte of English Poesie, eds. Gladys Doidge Willcock – Alice Walker, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1936, ix–cx.
Willis, Charles Murray: The Printing of The Arte of English Poesie and the Earl of Oxford, in Richard Malim (ed.): Great Oxford: essays on the life and work of Edward De Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, 1550–1604, London, Parapress Limited, 2004, 38–44.
Wood, Derek N. C.: Aristotle and Milton’s Poetics, in Heinrich F. Plett (ed.): Renaissance–Poetik, Berlin–New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1994, 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872064.362
