Page 55 [55]
OCR
What can I know (if trust in knowledge has been lost)? 153 rise of oil prices made people aware of the danger of the exhaustion of fossil fuel sources. Ihey put two and two together and realised that this could be detrimental to their future; this made them receptive to green views. In other words, they thought as could be expected from a businessman. However, it is not this that happened; guite the contrary. People became conscious of environmental issues in the last third of the past century as part of a new form of social discontent, which had nothing to do with economic trends. The children of the society of plenty, who were able to enjoy the blessings of consumer mass culture and experience the positive effects of a growing redistribution of wealth by the state and strong trade unions, started to feel increasingly ill at ease in the world of abundance imagined by their parents — and this has lasted ever since. Not the plenty, but the dissatisfaction. The complaints of the alternative movements, counter- and subcultures, dissatisfaction and civil disobedience that have developed from the sixties have been directed not against the quantity of the produced and consumable goods, but against the quality of life. Far from demanding a higher share of the spoils for themselves, they rejected everything the system had to offer in the areas of work, politics, their physical environment and consumption. Their anti-system desires — that questioned the reason for existence of the conditions of power — were called “radical” needs. The documents of the contemporary counter-culture — including green parties’ founding documents — gave equal weight to the soullessness of work and the inhumanity of working conditions as the destruction of the environment and the rejection of the consumerist way of life. Jonathon Porritt, founder of the English Green Party, explains why. The majority of critics of industrial society had yet to realise that “It is not alienation from the means of production or even from the fruits of production that really matters, but alienation from the process of the production that really matters. The left has simply got hooked on the wrong thing. The socialization of the means of production is all but irrelevant if the process remains unchanged. This alienation, characteristic of all industrial systems, capitalist or communist, is the key to understanding the kind of changes we are going to have to make.””’ In my opinion, Porritt has captured the heart of ecological politics, which is regularly missed by those who create a philosophy for the protection of the environment. The environment cannot be protected while for most people work remains a 27 Jonathon Porritt: Seeing Green: The Politics of Ecology Explained, p.81. Wiley — Blackwell, Oxford, 1984.
