Page 237 [237]
OCR
THE TRAGEDY OF MAN AS THEATRUM THEOLOGICUM (A DRAMATURG’S DIARY) it could have happened, nevertheless. Antal Németh” directed the Tragedy in a studio in 1939, after the famous technical “fireworks” of the 1937 main-stage production. I wonder: what might the dimensions of the National Chamber Theater’s studio have been? Németh: “I’m producing the Tragedy on a stage that fits one’s palm, foregoing all technical tricks.” How could Antal Németh have avoided facing the fundamental conflict between theatricality and the story in the text, which is as old as theater itself?! How could a director of such largescale format and thought, who understood the dramaturgical character of the Shakespearean stage so profoundly, avoid the temptation of empty space? Gyorgy Lengyel, the other great Madach interpreter and director in Hungarian theatrical history, mentions a religious ceremony taking place in an intimate atmosphere in his writing about the Antal Németh studio production.”! An open-winged altar’s changing panel paintings indicated the settings, and Madach quotations written on ribbons (“speech ribbons,” in the manner of medieval painters) led the viewer: I mention them lest I omit the pre-Brechtian element of the Antal Németh-esque conception. Eighteen actors played the Tragedy, conceiving the work as an oratorio. A speaking chorus. And another thing: the set designer, Balas Laszl6 Visky, painted the altar paintings.” In the present production, a 2 by 1 meter table appears in the long axis of the stage from time to time. The emphasized scenes take place on this table: for example, this is where we will see the tiny pyramids constructed of sand, or just a single one, we'll see. The possibility of using projections comes up: from above onto the 2 m? table and the 26 m? stage — Purcarete has in mind mainly animated versions ofthe emblems of the civilizations in the historical scenes. I recommend Géza M. Tóth to him, and we instantly watch the animated film director’s marvelous Ergo. Again, that pure childlike enthusiasm for this truly poetic film: he’s deeply touched by the work’s purity, its refined, tragic quality and poetic respiration. I promise Silviu to phone Géza, as long as the theater’s manager, Attila Balazs, agrees; he, by the way, is one of the three Lucifers (alongside Andrea Tokai and Andras Zsolt Bandi). Of course, uncertainties arise over whether the intended form can tolerate digital interventions — but we let this decision await the evolutionary process. But I go ahead and phone Géza M. Toth, today. Antal Németh (1903-1968): Hungarian director, professor, theater manager, historian of theater. Gyôrgy Lengyel: La tragédie de l'Homme, poème dramatique d’Imre Madächi, L'Annuaire théâtral 47 (2010), 157-171. Tamás Koltai: Az ember tragédiája a színpadon, Budapest, Kelenföld, 1990, 111. In fact, his name was Balás László Viski, but his name was printed in the program with a y. It is worth mentioning that Balás Viski, born in 1909 in Dés (today: Dej, Romania), was a student in the Accademia de Belle Arte in Cluj, whence he arrived at the Hungarian Conservatory of Applied Art in Budapest. e 235 "
