Seite 36 [36]
OCR
SASKIA FISCHER actions have a symbolic meaning and are performed as significant gestures. Likewise, the Bible is held up high for all to see in the Roman Catholic Mass. It is not just a book; it is a sacred text that deserves special awe and attention. The outstanding status of the Bible is indicated by the theatrical way in which it is staged (you have to literally look up to it, and it is addressed as a “holy text,” “the word of God”). As a result, rituals mark themselves out as striking and important actions that differ from everyday life while also gaining a special kind of seriousness and solemnness. This way, both religious and profane rituals emphasize what is of particular importance to the social group or community (such as a person, a value, an event, a myth, etc.) and should possess great significance and authority.’ Rituals are, furthermore, practices that open up symbolic dimensions of meaning, which are not only represented in the ritual but are created in the process of its performance. It is the arts — the choir singing, the artistic decoration (e.g., images, clothing, and props), the choreography of movements — incorporated in a ritual causing an intense effect of “transcendence,” meaning, or community. One can describe rituals themselves as great works of art, which develop their effect on their participants through an artistically elaborated, and thus an emotional and sensual experience.® Therefore, the meaning of rituals cannot be understood simply by a “subtext” or cognitive interpretation. Rather, rituals are performative practices in a very fundamental sense? It is particularly interesting for the question ofthe relationship between ritual and art, in which rituals unfold their social function as symbolic and aesthetic practices. This is one of the central arguments of Wolfgang Braungart’s work on ritual and literature.’° Since rituals address their participants emotionally with their elaborative form and even involve them physically, they can lead to an intensive, integrative, and community-building effect. Second: In what Way are Theater and Drama Strongly Related to Rituals? The main attributes of rituals outlined above — such as repetition, a formally structured and standardized process, performativity, significance, self-referentiality, an elaborated aesthetical and symbolic presentation, a deliberated staging, as well as the social impact of rituals as symbolic and communicative actions — are also constitutive for drama and theater. This highlights that theater and drama are fundamentally related to ritual practice. See my definition in Fischer: Ritual und Ritualität, 28-32; Wolfgang Braungart: Ritual und Literatur, Tübingen, Niemeyer, 1996; Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger: Rituale, Frankfurt a. M./ New York, Campus, 2013. Martin Mosebach: Häresie der Formlosigkeit: Die römische Liturgie und ihr Feind, München, Rowohlt Taschenbuch, 2012. On the wide-ranging significance of the performative in a ritual see Fischer: Ibid., 28-32. Braungart: Ritual und Literatur. +34»
