Oldal 98 [98]
OCR
SHAKESPEARE’S ART OF POESY IN KING LEAR For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ. [...] For the body is not one member, but many. / If the foot shall say, Because I am not the hand, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body? / And if the ear shall say, Because I am not the eye, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body? / If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling? / But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him. [...] And whether one member suffers, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it. / Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular. (1Cor 12:12-27) Saint Paul’s image of the “mystical body” of Christ comprising the Christian community proved an excellent manifestation of the Church’s interest in order to support the authority of religious institutions as opposed to the worldly and political ones. As the influence of the Church started growing even in political affairs, the practice of applying the Pauline corporeal analogy to the description of society also became widespread. As Paul Archambault points out, Pope Gregory VII was the first to state emphatically that “the body politic [is] co-extensive with the body mystical,”**’ a claim which set off a series of debates concerning who should rule over this body: the representative of the temporal power or divine power. In England, with the Act of Supremacy, Henry VIII redefined the meaning of this universal “mystical body” and established the special religious and political unity of “the Church of England as contrasted to the Church in England.”?% He took advantage of the organic analogy for his own political interest and applied it in a more mundane context, claiming, “this realm of England is an empire... governed by one Supreme Head and King... unto whom a body politic, compact of all sorts and degrees of people... be bounden and owe to bear next to God a natural and humble obedience.”** In the early Tudor period, many well-known authors relied on the organic analogy when discussing various matters related to the state. The corporeal imagery appears in the works of Thomas More, Sir Thomas Elyot, John Fisher, as well as for instance in the sermons of Stephen Gardiner and Thomas Starkey.*” Even in the second half of the sixteenth century, some traces of this anthropomorphic analogy could be found in homilies that were written with the purpose of 3 Ibid., 26. 360 Ibid., 48. 361 Ibid., 48. 362 For a detailed discussion of this period see ibid., 48-68. Moreover, as Noemi Najbauer highlights, even John Donne, court preacher to King James, used the state as body imagery to ensure stability in society. Noémi Maria Najbauer: “The Art of Salvation, is but the Art of Memory”: Memory as Art and Devotion in the Sermons of John Donne, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Budapest, 2010, 189-193. 8 + % +
