OCR
52 TAMÁS Kocsis Recommended reading Harangozó, G. — Csutora, M. — Kocsis, T. 2018. “How big is big enough? Toward a sustainable future by examining alternatives to the conventional economic growth paradigm”. Sustainable Development, 26/2: 172-181. It gives a systematic overview of the paradigms of positive, zero and negative economic growth, and their advantages and disadvantages in the economic management of the sustainability problem. A tabular summary provides a quick overview. Bibliography Bajmöcy, Zoltan 2022. , Helyettesíthető-e a természeti és az ember alkotta tőke, avagy a technolögia mindent megold?” [Are natural and man-made capital complements or substitutes, or does technology solve everything?] Kovdsz, 26: e5. https://doi. org/10.14267/kov.2022e5 Barbier, Edward B. 1989. Economics, Natural-Resource Scarcity and Development: Conventional and Alternative Views. London, Earthscan Publications Limited. Barnett, Harod J. — Morse, Chandler 1963. Scarcity and Economic Growth: The Economics of Natural Resource Availability. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press. Baumol, William J. — Oates, Wallace Eugene 1988. The theory of environmental policy. 2nd Edition. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. Boulding, Kenneth Ewart 1966. The economics of the coming spaceship Earth. In Jarrett, Henry (ed.): Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Resources for the Future. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 3-14. Christensen, Paul P. 1989. “Historical roots for ecological economics — biophysical versus allocative approaches”. Ecological Economics, 1: 17-36. Christensen, Paul P. 1991. Driving forces, increasing returns and ecological sustainability. In Costanza (ed.): Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York, Columbia University Press, 75—87. Csutora, Mária 2022. , Rossz mutató vagy csak bűnbak? A GDP mint jólléti mutatószám" IGDP as a well-being indicator — Bad indicator or just a scapegoat?]. Kovász, 26: el0. https://doi.org/10.14267/kov.2022e10 Daly, Herman E. 1979. Entropy, growth and the political economy of scarcity. In Smith, V. Kerry (ed.) 1979: Scarcity and Growth Reconsidered. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press. Daly, Herman E. — Cobb, J. B. Jr. 1989. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment and a Sustainable Future. Boston, Beacon Press. Dombi, Mihály 2022. , Közgazdaságtan és társadalmi metabolizmus? [Economics and material throughput]. Kovdsz, 26: e4. https://doi.org/10.14267/kov.2022e4 Easterlin, Richard Ainley 1974. Does economic growth improve the human lot? In David, Paul A. — Reder, Melvin W. (eds.): Nations and Households in Economic Growth. New York: Academic Press. Gébert, Judit 2022. , Gazdasági növekedés: mennyi az elég?" [Economic growth: how much is enough?] Kovász, 26: e7. https://doi.org/10.14267/kov.2022e7 Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press Gordon, H. Scott. 1954. “Economic theory of acommon-property resource: the fishery”. Journal of Political Economy, 62: 124-142. Gray, Lewis Cecil 1914. “Rent under the assumption of exhaustibility”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 28: 466-489.