Seite 64 [64]
OCR
They would be crazy to abandon the idyll of their ignorant and servile condition for the sake of freedom and knowledge. What do they do instead? And if he once more had to compete with those perpetual prisoners in forming judgments about those shadows while his vision was still dim, before his eyes had recovered, and if the time a needed for getting accustomed were not at all short, wouldn't he be the source of laughter, and wouldn't it be said of him that he went up and came back with his eyes corrupted, and that it’s not even worth trying to go up? And if they were somehow able to get their hands on and kill the man who attempts to release and lead up wouldn’t they kill him? Platon’s (Glaucon’s) answer is as follows: “No doubt about it.” (Ibid 517.4.) Knowledge requires work. Only the palsied prophets get it for free, though they are celebrated by the enslaved masses. “Wisdom wearies, nothing is worthwhile; you shall not crave!” says Nietzsche, who then adds, ,,this new table found I hanging even in the public markets. Break up for me, O my brothers, break up also that new table! The weary-o’-the-world put it up, and the preachers of death and the jailer: for behold, it is also a sermon for slavery (Knechtschaft).” (KSA IV.p.258.) To paraphrase Nietzsche: only chase the dogs away from me, the lazy hiders and the busy swine. According to the other version of the legend of Sais, those who draw aside the curtain covering the truth find nothing. Or perhaps they do? Schiller is sure they do, as is Novalis. repeat: the truth punishes those who demean it. Those are the sort of people who demand the truth immediately, without putting in the work it demands. They are the sort who go to fortune-tellers and seers, and they deserve what they get. Novalis tells this story in a different way. Truth does indeed punish the one who violates it. But how? With himself. This is exactly what happens in Novalis’s Die Lehringen zu Sais (The Novices of Sais), in a very philosophical way. It is no accident that Novalis once shared a schoolyard with Hegel and Schelling. The most interesting part of his work is the comment he affixed to it. I must
