Page 23 [23]
OCR
chair or not-chair. It does not require long reflection to recognize the simple truth of this. The contrary, on the other hand, does not hold true: being the opposite of black-white does not determine what exact color something is, since this could be red or green, but cannot be both at the same time. In fact, it may be that neither is true: it is neither green nor blue. The contradictory, however, is an excluding contradiction: something is either green or non-green. It is either-or, as the worthy Sgren Kierkegaard believed. The identity of the “I” thus means that all that is “not-I” is conditioned by the “I” because the I defines everything, while nothing defines it. “Ifthe not-Lis set against the self, and the form of the self is unconditionality, then the form of the not-I must be conditional; and it can become the content of a first principle only insofar as it is assumed by me.”( See ibid p.13.) Based on these first two, the third basic principle almost necessarily follows: 3.) Unconditionality defines conditionality (Die Unbedingtheit bestimmt die Bedigtheit). That is, the same assumes the other. Well, we seem to have taken a step forward with this, and it seems to be a meaningful basis for our actual world. I determine who or what is “other” when compared to me (!). Even everyday thinking confirms this. It is important to note, however, that the same by itself has no content, as we have said and as Hegel also suggests. Narcissus has no “self” image, since he has no “he was aloof, hated, and loved: in himself, as in others, he sought the true essence of perfection.” Narcissus therefore understands nothing. He wanders in the meadow, hears a sound, but does not understand what the sound is, does not understand what a flower is, nor what fragrance is, nor a bird. He does not understand the self because of his lack of any self-knowledge that would make such reflection possible, something that he could see himself in relation to. Here Kierkegaard 8 See the chapter titled “The Actor’.
