Seite 28 [28]
OCR
‘The latter is the copy of the Veronese editio princeps, with decorations truly fit90 91 CsonTtosı 1890, 40. Csontosi assumed that the Dresden codex was a copy of the incunabulum, simply because the first edition of the work can also be found in Istanbul. In the end, he preceded the opinion of RopakıEwıTz 1940. Csaropi 1973, Nr. 688.; It should be noted that Csapodi was not aware of the spread out debate about the authorship of the images. One hypothesis is that the author is Matteo de’ Pasti, whose patron was Sigismondo Pandolfo Malatesta, Lord of Rimini (see Donari, a cura di, I/ potere, le arti, la Guerra, 2011). According to Corrado Ricci, the decorator of the Tempio Malatestiano, the codex, and the incunabulum are not the same person, but he assumes that Matteo de’ Pasti took a manuscript with him to Constantinople as a gift from his master Sigismondo Pandolfo Malatestiano to Sultan Muhammad II (Rıccı 1925). However, Ropaxiew1Tz 1940, 17. says it is unlikely. Nonetheless, Matteo was indeed in Constantinople at the invitation of the Sultan. Cf. BaBINGER 1951. See also SAKASIAN 1939. Csaropı 1973, Nr. 687. Cf. BaLocu J. 1966, I, 315. Nice photos were published by Mırano E. 2002. This codex was produced before the first printed edition. Csaropı 1973, Nr. 686. Csonrosi 1890a; TRÔGEL 1964. 26
