Seite 114 [114]
OCR
HANS ERICH BÖDEKER Godhead lay in the fact that even a divine man would always retain a merely individual perfection.’ IV This Enlightened criticism of dogma was the prerequisite for a new belief. The self-confident protagonists of the Enlightenment aimed at a reasonable belief; they were convinced that despite all differences, reason and revelation could coexist in harmony. The congruence of faith and reason became a leitmotiv of eighteenth-century theological and philosophical discussions. Leibniz’s writings on religion had a double thrust: he integrated revealed religion into his philosophical system, but only on condition that from now on any biblical exegesis that went against reason was inadmissible.'!° This view was later picked up by Christian Wolff (1679-1754): “...divine reason is the source of all truth, and, because of its perfection, it cannot bring forth anything inconsistently; thus what God is said to have revealed cannot go against the truth of reason.” 7 He conceived of the relationship between reason and revelation as complementary. The counter-rational objection founded on the notion of Gods will and omnipotence was inadmissible, “because the reason for God being willing to or able to do anything must also be rationally explicable.”!# In this context Wolff made a comprehensive list of criteria for the truth of revelations, and he drew up a system of natural or rational religion. He repeatedly drew attention to suitability as a defense of Christianity. Nevertheless, there were many variations of detail in the idea of the congruence of faith and reason which formed the central feature of the Enlightenment religious discourse. Lessing’s view was that revelation gave men nothing “that human reason, left to itself, would not discover for itself; it merely gives him the most important of these things more quickly.” Until men perceived revealed truth as rational, he claimed, they remained unmerited “for the tuition of historical truth”, in regard of “providing evidence of necessary rational truth”.''? In his study Die vornehmesten Wahrheiten der natiirlichen Religion (Principal 15 On the context cf. KAISER, Gerhard, Vergôtterung und Tod. die thematische Einheit in Schillers Werke, Stuttgart, Metzler, 1967., and KÖPCKE-DÜTTLER, Arnold, Friedrich Schillers Entwurf eines prometheischen Christentums. Versuch einer Pädagogik der Selbsterhebung, Philosophisches Jahrbuch 88 (1982), 282-300. 16 LEIBNIZ, Theodizee (note 54), vol. 1, $ 39. 17 Wo FE, Verniinftige Gedanken (note71), $ 1014. 18 Ibid., $ 80. 119 Lessing, Über den Beweis des Geistes und der Kraft (1777); Schriften LM, vol. 13, 5. = e 112"
