OCR
SUPERVISION EXPERIENCE AND EXPECTATION OF CHILD PROTECTION WORKERS IN ESTONIAN MUNICIPALITIES O iIndividual | Group SV- Team SV- Network Fans Scale zation Average (%) SV-on (%) on (%) on (%) SV-on (%) SV-on (%) 5-10 times per 1.9 3.1 8.5 8.5 0.9 5.5 year more than 10 . 0.0 0.0 7.5 3.8 0.9 2.8 times per year Regular . 1.9 3.1 16.0 12.3 1.8 8.3 experience Single and . 11.3 27.9 29.2 37.8 15.0 26.6 regular in total Table 1. The types and frequency of supervision offered in Estonian municipalities (N=106, respondents). The study shows that 88,7% of respondents don’t have any experience in individual supervision and 68% don’t have experience in group supervision (Table 1). Only 1,9% respondents have regular individual supervision experience and 10,5 of respondents have regular group supervision experience. The benefits of supervision Number of times mentioned Finding solution 16 Sharing the experience and concerns with colleagues 16 Discussion and cooperation with colleagues 14 Generating ideas 11 The renewed focus on the case 9 Getting the support and confidence 8 Getting new information 6 Sharing responsibility for decision-making 5 Getting the support and confirmation for thoughts and deeds 5 Dealing with feelings and reflection 5 Other 7 No efficiency 2 Table 2. The benefits from experienced supervision (All type of the supervision, N=106). * 183 ¢