Page 108 [108]
OCR
BRIGITTE SCHIGL about wanted and unwanted effects of supervision. She found similar riskcategories as the supervision experts: The supervisors’ competence should be well balanced between enough know-how in the field but the supervisor should not be too close to the field (danger of blind spots). One structural risk-theme is the power of supervisors, which they sometimes do not consider. Therefore supervisors’ feedbacks can be a mighty instrument of evaluation and can do harm especially in team/group settings by favouring individuals. Process risk-variables are the insufficient regard of problems, dynamics and aims of the team. Quick decisions should not be part of supervision processes. Some supervisees mentioned that the difference between psychotherapy (selfawareness, private themes) and supervision should be better attended. Some supervisees complain about the monotony, poorness of methods and dullness of permanent supervision processes. Karlinger?? stated in her qualitative research on gender-competence of supervisors that the insensitive dealing with gender and sexual orientation, preferring one gender, perpetuating gender-stereotypes or the like are a source of risk in supervision. The supervisees also criticize that some supervisors are too faint-hearted to address (hazardous) gender-dynamics in teams. Supervisors should have knowledge of specific gender dynamics like dealing with power or rivalry. WHAT EXPERIENCES OF INJURIES IN SUPERVISION ARE REPORTED BY SUPERVISEES? On this matter Ehrhardt” analysed online-questionnaire-data from 154 supervisees about the kind of injury, the supervisor, the harmful setting and how the injured persons dealt with the harm. More than 60% of all injuries occured in multi-person-settings (team and group supervision). Most “dangerous” is supervision in stationary settings, at the place of work with compulsory attendance when the boss is taking part in the supervision or he/ she is the supervisor him/herself. The reported injuries were insult, humiliation, devaluation and compromising. In single person setting (19%) the most frequent injuries were transgression of limits and violation of personal borders, insult Arbeit, Diplomarbeit Masterlehrgang Klinische Soziale Arbeit FH Campus Wien, 2010, http:// permalink.obvsg.at/fcw/AC08287895, accessed 11 August 2015. Sabine Karlinger, Gender matters?! Genderkompetenz in der Supervision, Saarbriicken, VDM Verlag, 2011. Ehrhardt — Petzold, Wenn Supervisionen schaden. * 106 +
