Direkt zum Inhalt
mobile

L'Harmattan Open Access platform

  • Suche
  • OA Kollektionen
  • L'Harmattan Archive
Deutschde
  • Englishen
  • Françaisfr
  • Magyarhu
AnmeldenRegistrieren
  • Buch Übersicht
  • Seite
  • Text
  • Metadaten
  • Clipping
Vorschau
022_000061/0000

Ambiguous Topicality: a Philther of State-Socialist Hungarian Theatre

  • Vorschau
  • PDF
  • Zeige Metadaten
  • Permanenten Link anzeigen
Autor
Árpád Kékesi Kun
Field of science
Előadóművészet (zene, színháztudomány, dramaturgia) / Performing arts studies (Musicology, Theater science, Dramaturgy) (13051)
Series
Collection Károli. Monograph
Type of publication
tanulmánykötet
022_000061/0081
  • Buch Übersicht
  • Seite
  • Text
  • Metadaten
  • Clipping
Seite 82 [82]
  • Vorschau
  • Permanenten Link anzeigen
  • JPG
  • TIFF
  • zurück
  • Weiter
022_000061/0081

OCR

FREEDOM FIGHT FOR LOVE, AN EXCELLENT FARCE AND SOME MUSIC BY LEHÄR acting became so brilliant that some reviewers did not deduce the figure of Fleury from Honthy, but deduced the adaptation itself from Fleury. (Even if Fleury is missing from both the 1909 Vienna and the 1937 Berlin versions of the operetta made under Lehar’s supervision.) From Fleury, who feels disdain for “the whole progress, regarding all that fly towards the future, [...] all that change, accelerate and move forward, as a fantasy. [...] What was a frivolous and dizzying moth dance in the 1910s is all whirling now in Madame Fleury’s words." As usually, e.g. in the Students of Vienna and The Csardas Princess, Honthy played “herself”: a prima donna. But in the role of the matchmaker she became a key figure in reviews now, since Fleury/Honthy was thought to embody the critique of an era, considered very important from an ideological point of view.*“* This critique, in turn, proved to be crucial for theatre people too, as they regarded The Count of Luxembourg as not suitable for stage production without it. Since it had been originally missing from the play, György Székely claimed that the libretto had been the main obstacle of bringing Lehar’s music closer to an audience of workers.°*” Among Lehär’s operettas, however, the text of The Count of Luxembourg provided the best opportunity for “a healthy and correct script built on a satirical core”, as they had learned the lesson from Orpheus, in which they “had tried to update a play beyond the boundaries of music, but got embroiled in a contradiction that could hardly be solved”. 1937 Berlin version of Der Graf von Luxemburg. Lehär composed the couplet “Was ist das für’ne Zeit, liebe Leute?” in the third act for princess Anastasia Kokozeff, which gave Ernö Innocent Vincze sufficient inspiration in terms of lyrics too. Consequently, Fleury’s entrée is princess Kokozeff’s couplet, transferred to act one. Unlike Fleury, the princess is preserved not by “modesty and good manners”, but by vodka and cigar smoke, and she had no musical number in the first version of the operetta, just in the second. She, the princess, who appears only in the last act as a dea ex machina, was transformed into Fleury, Angéle’s friend in the adaptation of Békeffy and Kellér, playing an important role in all three acts. In addition, she was credited with two more numbers: a medley in the second act, arranged from songs of The Merry Widow, and also a duet (the popular “Polka dancer” duet) with Sir Basil, which he originally sang with Juliette. Béla Matrai-Betegh: Luxemburg gröfja. Lehär operettje a Fövärosi Operettszinhäzban, Magyar Nemzet, Vol. 8, No. 302, 254 December, 1952, 5. Cf. “The authors of the original play [...] only wanted to write a romantic, more or less efficacious, action-packed and entertaining libretto for the music of Franz Lehar, and they did not realize what the adaptors did, namely, how much they could entrust to this actress, Madame Fleury. The whole critique of the age.” Ibid. - However, the role of Fleury was not devoid of arbitrary moments, as shown by her musical medley in the second act. Milyutin, who visited the Operetta Theatre, also referred to this fact when he stated that “Hanna Honthy’s number in Act II seems to stall the plot. I know it was right to insert her number for the stage effect, because Honthy is a very great artist and she sings this song delightfully. But from a dramaturgical point of view, I do not approve the insertion of such numbers.” Gaspar: Napló Miljutyin elvtárs látogatásáról, 165. Cf. A Luxemburg grófja című darab ismertetése. Gyorsírói feljegyzés a Fővárosi Operettszínháznak 1952. szeptember 17-én tartott társulati üléséről (- Társulati ülés), Typed manuscript, 2—3. Location: Ihe Hungarian Theatre Museum and Institute, 2010.105.1. 347 348 349 + 80°

Strukturell

Custom

Image Metadata

Bild Breite
1831 px
Bild Höhe
2835 px
Bild Auflösung
300 px/inch
Dateigröße
1.36 MB
Permalink zum JPG
022_000061/0081.jpg
Permalink zur OCR
022_000061/0081.ocr

Links

  • L'Harmattan Könyvkiadó
  • Open Access Blog
  • Kiadványaink az MTMT-ben
  • Kiadványaink a REAL-ban
  • CrossRef Works
  • ROR ID

Contact

  • L'Harmattan Szerkesztőség
  • Kéziratleadási szabályzat
  • Peer Review Policy
  • Adatvédelmi irányelvek
  • Dokumentumtár
  • KBART lists
  • eduID Belépés

Social media

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

L'Harmattan Open Access platform

AnmeldenRegistrieren

Benutzeranmeldung

eduId Login
Ich habe mein Passwort vergessen
  • Suche
  • OA Kollektionen
  • L'Harmattan Archive
Deutschde
  • Englishen
  • Françaisfr
  • Magyarhu