Oldal 377 [377]
OCR
HUMAN DIGNITY AND ‘ILLIBERAL DEMOCRACY’ IN TIME OF CRISIS Central and Eastern European states’ dependence on foreign capital — as Bojan Bugari¢ and Mitchel Orenstein argue — also seemed to force governments in this region to endorse neoliberal economics especially prior to 2008. This has created a greater possibility of populist backlash, and after the global financial crisis rightwing populist parties’ policies shifted towards economic nationalism based on ‘work, family, fatherland.’ In the case of the Orban governments since 2010 this does not mean that they are against globalisation and big businesses with transnational corporations.'* According to Gabor Scheirig the Orbanomics’ propagates a social-Darwinist model of work-based society’, based on ’neo-illiberalism.’” The packed Hungarian Constitutional Court rubber stamped the government’s neoliberal economic policy, changing its predecessor’s practice, which in the mid 1990’s was willing to strike down austerity measures for the protection of social rights closely tying them to the protection of equal human dignity. Although social solidarity was an underdeveloped societal practice from the beginning of the democratic transition for several reasons, originally the Constitutional Court strongly committed itself to the protection of human dignity and this way guaranteed a higher profile for social (solidarity) rights, especially in case of social care based on neediness. Then, as a contrast, in the ‘non-solidary’ system of the Hungarian Fundamental Law of 2011 social security does not appear as a fundamental right, but merely https://www.socialeurope.eu/where-did-trumpism-come-from?fbclid=IwA R1C) YiPF_6uF alCGgHB9TKIDTk-ppcu3ZFnfAPpyoZYxGaSE5ccpugcCnw. Similarly, Simon Wren-Lewis, Why neoliberalism can end in autocratic, populist and incompetent plutocrac, Mainly Macro (22 September 2020), https://mainlymacro.blogspot. com/2020/09/why-neoliberalism-can-end-in-autocratic.html. See Mitchel Orenstein — Bojan Bugari¢, How Populism Emerged from the Shadow of Neoliberalism in Central and Eastern Europe, LSEblogpost (October 21, 2020), https:// blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2020/10/21/how-populism-emerged-from-the-shadow- ofneoliberalism-in-central-and-eastern-europe/. Mitchel Orenstein — Bojan Bugari¢, Work, Family, Fatherland: the political economy of populism in central and Eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy (19 October 2020), https:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501763.2020.1832557?journalCode=rjpp20. See Gabor Scheiring, The Retreat of Liberal Democracy. Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary, London, Palgrave MacMillan, 2020. Gabor Scheiring, Why businesses embrace populists and what to do about it: lessons from Hungary, The Conversation (September 8, 2020), https://theconversation.com/whybusinesses-embrace-populists-and-what-to-do-about-it-lessons-from-hungary-141757?fb clid=IwAR1CJYiPF_6uFalCGgHBITKIDTk-ppcu3ZFnfAPpyoZYxGaSE5ccpugcCnw. The term ‘neo-illiberalism’ first appeared in Reijer Hendrikse, Neoliberalism is over — welcome to the era of neo-illiberalism, openDemocracy (7 May, 2020), https://www. opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/neoliberalism-is-over-welcome-to-the-era-of-neo-il liberalism/?fbclid=IwAR1CJ YiPF_6uFalCGgHB9TKIDTk-ppcu3ZFnfAPpyoZYxGaSE5c cpugcCnw. + 375 *
