OCR
CSILLA LEHOCZKY-KOLLONAY The negative impact of monitoring, especially when combined with a dependent status — is evidently violating the dignity of a person. The fact that he knows he is monitored, is not protecting rather endangering his dignity. This is where “Panoticism” returns and highlights the dangers for dignity implied in modern surveillance methods including the growing role of algorithms. The importance of strict guidelines and explicit requirements on the “nonmaterial” workplace conditions need attention from all interested actors. CONCLUSION The brief overview of the role of dignity under the global and European documents justifies that examining dignity as a non-material concept is not narrowing, rather broadening. Not questioning its indispensable interrelationship with the basic labour standards its independent examination represents high level public interest under technical conditions of today and tomorrow. This public interest requires and already established the role of the state bridging the publicprivate divide and its obligations in permanently adjusting the regulatory and institutional environment to the changing conditions, including and relying on the role given to further actors — employers, trade unions and other civil organisations. BIBLIOGRAPHY FoucaulLtT, Michel, Discipline and Punish, New York, NY, Vintage Books, 1995. KRESAL, Barbara, Article 1 - Human Dignity, in: Filip Dorssemont — Klaus Lörcher — Stefan Clauwaert — Mélanie Schmitt (eds.), The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the Employment Relation, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2019, 191-208. LAVAQUE-MANTY, Mika, Universalizing Dignity in the Nineteenth Century, in Remy Debes (ed.): Dignity: A History, Oxford, OUP, Online: June 2017, 301322. LÖRCHER, Klaus, Article 3 — The Right to Safe and Healthy Working Conditions, in Niklas Bruun — Klaus Loercher — Isabelle Schoemann — Stefan Clauwaert (eds.), The European Social Charter and the Employment Relation, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2017, 181-197. MCCRUDDEN, Christopher, Human Dignity and Judicial, Interpretation of Human Rights, The European Journal of International Law 19 (2008), 655-724. + 320 +