Seite 51 [51]
OCR
also must have been buried in Thebes based on his funerary cone®’ — however, his tomb has not been found. His service in Memphis is more certainly indicated by his title /34/-° n Mn-nfr ‘mayor of Memphis’ than it is in the case of Nebamun. The title jmj-r3 snw.tj ‘overseer of the double granary’, which Qenamun also bore, was presumably associated. with that of ‘mayor of Memphis’, since the mayor as the leader of the settlement was responsible for agriculture and for ensuring a sufficient food supply, as well as for collecting the surplus in the form of taxes. He was also in charge of the collection and transportation of the taxes, grain and other commodities.** The duties belonging to these two offices required the personal presence of the official in the royal residence and Qenamun’s place of function was also in Memphis. Besides the two examples discussed above, there are three other individuals about whom little can be ascertained regarding their place of function in the northern region either from their titles or from their monuments. The only object that has remained relating to Iuti, who served under Thutmose IV, is a round-topped votive stele which was found in Giza near the Sphinx (now in Cairo, JE 72268), depicting the ruler making an offering to Horemakhet in the upper register, and the kneeling figure of Iuti in the pose of adoration in the lower register with two columns of inscriptions before him.” As the purpose of the stele is votive and not funerary, it could be supposed that Iuti had other types of ties with the northern region than having been buried there, for instance, serving in the royal palace in Memphis. In the case of Heqanakht, dated to the reign of Amenhotep III, the indication is even indirect, since the stele he and his wife are known from (Leiden, AP.19) belongs to a certain Paimred and his spouse, Nebetnehet, ‘Lady of the sycamore’, whose name suggests a connection with the Memphite area.“° However, there is no information about the connection between Paimred and Heqanakht, they were presumably colleagues or somehow related." Sennefer can also be dated to the same ruler and his association with the Memphite region is based on his titles and the presumed provenance of his monument, a sistophor block statue (now in Berlin, AM 21595), once placed in the temple of Bastet in Bubastis.# His two religious titles connected 37 DM 23, for the inscription, see [3.2] Funerary cone DM 23 on p. 350. 35 Helck, 1958, 235-236; van den Boorn, 1988, 242-243; Van Siclen III, 1991, 159; Gessler-Löhr, 1997, 36. 539 Zivie, 1976, 166. For the inscription of the stele, see [11.1] Stele, Cairo, JE 72268 on p. 373. ve For the inscription of the stele, see [12.1] Stele, Leiden, AP.19 on p. 375. “According to Leemans, 1840, 280, Heqanakht and his wife receive an offering from their son and daughter in the second register, however, this kind of relationship is not plausible, since the mother of Paimred was named as Rai in the inscription at the bottom of the stele. Clére, 1970, 2; Gessler-Léhr, 1990, 71; Schulz, 1992, 80. For the inscription of the block statue, see [13.1] Sistophor statue, Berlin, AM 21595 on p. 377.
