Seite 216 [216]
OCR
IRODALOM 215 Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991): Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lénard, S., & Rapos, N. (2004): Magtdr — Ötletek az adaptiv oktatäshoz, Budapest: OKI. Lindblom-Ylänne, S. Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A. & Ashwin, P. (2006): How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (3): 285-298. Little, J. W. (1990): The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers’ Professional Relations. Teachers College Record, 91 (4): 509-536. Littleton, K. & Hakkinen, P. (1999): Learning together: Understanding the process of computer-based collaborative learning. In: Dillengourg, P. (ed.): Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, Oxford: Pergamon, 20-31. Lueddeke, G. R. (2003): Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: A study of disciplinary variation and ,teaching-scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (2): 213-228. doi: 10.1080/0307507032000058082 Lukács, I. & Derényi, A. (2017, szerk.): Kézikönyv a képzési programok tanulási eredményeken alapú fejlesztésébez, felülvizsgálatáboz, Budapest: Oktatási Hivatal. Lukács, I. (2015): Tanulási eredményekre alapuló fejlesztés, egy pilot tapasztalatai. In: Vámos Á. 8- Kopp E. (szerk.): A tanulás támogatásának új megözelítései és eszközei a felsőoktatásban. Kutatás, fejlesztés, akciókutatás. Budapest: Oktatási Hivatal, 77-110. Lukenchuk, A. & Kolich, E. (2013): Paradigms and Educational Research: Weaving the Tapestry. In: Lukenchuk, A. (2013, ed.): Paradigms of Research for the 21* Century. Perspectives and Examples from Practice. Peter Lang. 61-90. Marton, F, & Saljé, R. (1976a): On Qualitative Differences in Learning I.: Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 (1): 4-11. Marton, F. & Saljé, R. (1976b): On Qualitative Differences in Learning II.: Outcome as a Function of the Learner's Conception of the Task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 (2): 115-127. May, H. & Bridger, K. (2010): Developing and embedding inclusive policy and practice within higher education. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy. McAlpine, L. (2016): Why might you use narrative methodology? A story about narrative. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri, 4 (1): 32-57. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/eha.2016.4.1.02b McAlpine, L. & Weston, C. (2000): Reflection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning, Instructional Science, 28, 363-385. McDonald, J. & Cater-Steel, A. (2017, eds.): Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education. Dreamers and Schemers. Singapore: Springer. McDonald, J., Nagy, J., Star, C., Burch, T., Cox, M. D., & Margetts, F. (2012). Identifying and building the leadership capacity of community of practice facilitators. Learning Communities Journal, 4. https://eprints.usq.edu.au/26120/8/McDonald_Nagy_Star_ Burch_Cox_Margetts_LCJ_2012_AV.pdf Medina, L. C. (2018): Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1).
